These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20618242)

  • 21. [Five questions about the Kiwi OmniCup vacuum extractor].
    Deruelle P; Queste-Bothuyne E; Depret S; Subtil D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 17513162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rapid versus stepwise application of negative pressure in vacuum extraction-assisted vaginal delivery: a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Suwannachat B; Laopaiboon M; Tonmat S; Siriwachirachai T; Teerapong S; Winiyakul N; Thinkhamrop J; Lumbiganon P
    BJOG; 2011 Sep; 118(10):1247-52. PubMed ID: 21585643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A comparison of maternal and fetal complications during operative vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas and the vacuum extractor].
    Vanlieferinghen S; Girard G; Mandelbrot L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Dec; 38(8):648-54. PubMed ID: 19896285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R; Menon V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000446. PubMed ID: 10796203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vacuum extraction: a randomized controlled comparison of the New Generation cup with the original Bird cup.
    Carmody F; Grant A; Somchiwong M
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3735050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Vacca A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11866494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor.
    Putta LV; Spencer JP
    Am Fam Physician; 2000 Sep; 62(6):1316-20. PubMed ID: 11011860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.
    Johanson RB; Rice C; Doyle M; Arthur J; Anyanwu L; Ibrahim J; Warwick A; Redman CW; O'Brien PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 100(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 8334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between metal cup and silicone rubber cup vacuum extractor.
    Loghis C; Pyrgiotis E; Panayotopoulos N; Batalias L; Salamalekis E; Zourlas PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jul; 45(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Kiwi omnicup handheld versus Mityvac M-style conventional vacuum system: a retrospective observational study.
    Weissbach T; Hag-Yahia N; Ovadia M; Tzadikevitch Geffen K; Weitzner O; Biron-Shental T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Dec; 31(23):3178-3182. PubMed ID: 28793827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. WITHDRAWN: Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R; Menon V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Nov; 2010(11):CD000446. PubMed ID: 21069666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Failure of vacuum extractions: risk factors, maternal and fetal issues].
    Le Brun C; Beucher G; Morello R; Jones F; Lamendour N; Dreyfus M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Nov; 42(7):693-702. PubMed ID: 23702434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective cohort study of a new vacuum delivery device to assist with complicated labour in low-resource settings.
    Khan M; Hashmani FN; Ahmed S; Ahmed O; Asim SS; Wajahat Y; Sobani S; Syed S; Qazi F
    Trop Med Int Health; 2015 Feb; 20(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 25367864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical assessment of the Kobayashi vacuum extractor.
    Maryniak GM; Frank JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 6462575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.