181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20618248)
1. Is in vitro fertilisation more effective than stimulated intrauterine insemination as a first-line therapy for subfertility? A cohort analysis.
Chambers GM; Sullivan EA; Shanahan M; Ho MT; Priester K; Chapman MG
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 20618248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.
Werbrouck E; Spiessens C; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
Fertil Steril; 2006 Sep; 86(3):566-71. PubMed ID: 16952506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goverde AJ; McDonnell J; Vermeiden JP; Schats R; Rutten FF; Schoemaker J
Lancet; 2000 Jan; 355(9197):13-8. PubMed ID: 10615885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility.
Pashayan N; Lyratzopoulos G; Mathur R
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jun; 6():80. PubMed ID: 16796733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can we identify subfertile couples that benefit from immediate in vitro fertilisation over intrauterine insemination?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Tajik P; Custers IM; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; van Wely M; Mol BW; Zafarmand MH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():36-40. PubMed ID: 27156154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.
Custers IM; König TE; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Kaaijk E; Oosterhuis J; Mochtar MH; Repping S; van Wely M; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.
Bensdorp AJ; Slappendel E; Koks C; Oosterhuis J; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans F; Verhoeve H; de Bruin JP; van Weert JM; Traas M; Maas J; Beckers N; Repping S; Mol BW; van der Veen F; van Wely M
BMC Womens Health; 2009 Dec; 9():35. PubMed ID: 20021654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised controlled trial of intra-uterine insemination versus in vitro fertilisation in patients with idiopathic or mild male infertility.
Elzeiny H; Garrett C; Toledo M; Stern K; McBain J; Baker HW
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 54(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 24579923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for cervical factor subfertility improve pregnancy rates?
Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Verhoeve HR; van Dop PA; Hompes PG; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Mol BW
Hum Reprod; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2263-6. PubMed ID: 15333600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial.
Nandi A; Bhide P; Hooper R; Gudi A; Shah A; Khan K; Homburg R
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):1329-1335.e2. PubMed ID: 28501361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Intra-uterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation compared to an expectant management in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised study].
Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Hompes PG; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; Mol BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jul; 152(27):1525-31. PubMed ID: 18681363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Article for comment: is in vitro fertilisation more effective than stimulated intrauterine insemination as a first-line therapy for subfertility? A cohort analysis. Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Shanahan M, Ho MT, Priester K, Chapman MG.
Chamberlain S; Healy DL
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):583; author reply 583-4. PubMed ID: 21133878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment.
Custers IM; van Rumste MM; van der Steeg JW; van Wely M; Hompes PG; Bossuyt P; Broekmans FJ; Renckens CN; Eijkemans MJ; van Dessel TJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Steures P;
Hum Reprod; 2012 Feb; 27(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 22114108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility.
Dankert T; Kremer JA; Cohlen BJ; Hamilton CJ; Pasker-de Jong PC; Straatman H; van Dop PA
Hum Reprod; 2007 Mar; 22(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 17110396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poor success of gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for older women.
Harris ID; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jun; 94(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 19394605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superovulation-intrauterine insemination: an additional tool in the treatment of infertility.
Loh SK; Leong NK
Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 8783917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the treatment of subfertility.
Sikandar R; Virk S; Lakhani S; Sahab H; Rizvi J
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Dec; 15(12):782-5. PubMed ID: 16398971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral ovulation induction agents combined with low-dose gonadotropin injections and intrauterine insemination: cost- and clinical effectiveness.
Ryan GL; Moss V; Davis WA; Sparks AE; Dokras A; Van Voorhis BJ
J Reprod Med; 2005 Dec; 50(12):943-50. PubMed ID: 16444896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
