BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20619309)

  • 1. Assessment of undesirable events in cosmetic market surveillance: background, description and use of a causality assessment method in cosmetovigilance.
    Bons B; Audebert F; Bitaudeau C; Cachin N; Colson L; Farr C; Fix LA; Gilmour N; Gorni R; Griffiths M; Harris B; Holle V; Kirk S; Meredith E; Pari C; Poinsot P; Renner G;
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 20619309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causality methods in cosmetovigilance: comparison of Colipa and PLM versus global introspection.
    Zweers PG; Gilmour NJ; Hepburn PA; Gerritsen RF; van Puijenbroek EP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 22609380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cosmetovigilance: definition, regulation and use "in practice".
    Vigan M; Castelain F
    Eur J Dermatol; 2014; 24(6):643-9. PubMed ID: 25672787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in European legislation make it timely to introduce a transparent market surveillance system for cosmetics.
    Lodén M; Ungerth L; Serup J
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2007; 87(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17989885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cosmetovigilance: a French pharmacovigilance system for cosmetics developed by the French health products safety agency. A proposal for the future].
    Tissier MH; Lepagnol F
    Therapie; 2002; 57(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 12422542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sanitary control of cosmetics].
    Bonini M; Pellino P; Pilla M
    Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2005; 61(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 17206194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cosmetovigilance: the 'beautiful' risk.
    Moretti U; Velo G
    Drug Saf; 2008; 31(5):437-9. PubMed ID: 18422387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Monitoring cosmetic product safety].
    Vigan M
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Mar; 134(3 Pt 2):2S55-8. PubMed ID: 17563716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDA's response to food, dietary supplement, and cosmetic adverse events.
    Bren L
    FDA Consum; 2003; 37(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 12971342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EU and US clinical investigation adverse event reporting.
    Crowley G
    Med Device Technol; 2004 Jun; 15(5):30-2. PubMed ID: 15285486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients present in technical information files of finished products.
    Rogiers V; Pauwels M
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 2008; 36():94-114. PubMed ID: 18806455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU. Reality and challenges for the toxicologist.
    Pauwels M; Rogiers V
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 15177635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the adverse effects of cosmetics: a pilot project in cosmetovigilance.
    Sautebin L
    Drug Saf; 2008; 31(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 18422386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond the US submisson process.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2004 Apr; 15(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 15255536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The need for human data: the role of clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance in the safety assessment of macronutrient substitutes.
    Forbes AL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Feb; 23(1 Pt 2):S20-1; discussion S31-7. PubMed ID: 8801611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-marketing strategies for medicines.
    Breckenridge A
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Jan; 83(1):24-5; discussion 25. PubMed ID: 18043682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Pharmacologic surveillance and safety evaluation of new drugs].
    Reys LL
    Acta Med Port; 1991; 4(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 1950664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety assurance of cosmetics in Japan: current situation and future prospects.
    Inomata S
    J Oleo Sci; 2014; 63(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24389794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biosimilars approval process.
    Zuñiga L; Calvo B
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Apr; 56(3):374-7. PubMed ID: 19925842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. US and European postmarket clinical data requirements.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2005 Mar; 16(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 15828495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.