These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20620239)

  • 1. Validity of average, minimum, and maximum end-of-day recall assessments of pain and fatigue.
    Stone AA; Broderick JE; Schwartz JE
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 20620239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can End-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue?
    Broderick JE; Schwartz JE; Schneider S; Stone AA
    J Pain; 2009 Mar; 10(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 19070550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single momentary assessments are not reliable outcomes for clinical trials.
    Stone AA; Broderick JE; Kaell AT
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 20580945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peak and end effects in patients' daily recall of pain and fatigue: a within-subjects analysis.
    Schneider S; Stone AA; Schwartz JE; Broderick JE
    J Pain; 2011 Feb; 12(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 20817615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal trends in symptom experience predict the accuracy of recall PROs.
    Schneider S; Broderick JE; Junghaenel DU; Schwartz JE; Stone AA
    J Psychosom Res; 2013 Aug; 75(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 23915773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparability of Emotion Dynamics Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments, Daily Diaries, and the Day Reconstruction Method: Observational Study.
    Schneider S; Junghaenel DU; Gutsche T; Mak HW; Stone AA
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e19201. PubMed ID: 32969835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of end of day and ecological momentary assessments of pain and pain interference in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Carlozzi NE; Schilling S; Freedman J; Kalpakjian CZ; Kratz AL
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 30073468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods.
    Broderick JE; Schwartz JE; Vikingstad G; Pribbernow M; Grossman S; Stone AA
    Pain; 2008 Sep; 139(1):146-157. PubMed ID: 18455312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain.
    Stone AA; Broderick JE; Shiffman SS; Schwartz JE
    Pain; 2004 Jan; 107(1-2):61-9. PubMed ID: 14715390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alexithymia in chronic fatigue syndrome: associations with momentary, recall, and retrospective measures of somatic complaints and emotions.
    Friedberg F; Quick J
    Psychosom Med; 2007 Jan; 69(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 17244849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory for fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome: the relation between weekly recall and momentary ratings.
    Friedberg F; Sohl SJ
    Int J Behav Med; 2008; 15(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18444018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Should Thyroid-Related Quality of Life Be Assessed? Recalled Patient-Reported Outcomes Compared to Here-and-Now Measures.
    Boesen VB; Feldt-Rasmussen U; Bjorner JB; Cramon P; Groenvold M; Nygaard B; Rasmussen ÅK; Vilsbøll T; Watt T
    Thyroid; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1561-1570. PubMed ID: 30369298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods.
    Broderick JE; Schneider S; Schwartz JE; Stone AA
    Qual Life Res; 2010 Oct; 19(8):1163-70. PubMed ID: 20535565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heaviness of Alcohol Use, Alcohol Problems, and Subjective Intoxication Predict Discrepant Drinking Reports in Daily Life.
    Stevens AK; Sokolovsky AW; Treloar Padovano H; White HR; Jackson KM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2020 Jul; 44(7):1468-1478. PubMed ID: 32530512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes.
    Schneider S; Stone AA
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):497-506. PubMed ID: 26101141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of individual and composite recall pain measures in patients with cancer.
    Jensen MP; Wang W; Potts SL; Gould EM
    Pain Med; 2012 Oct; 13(10):1284-91. PubMed ID: 22925436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic.
    Stone AA; Schwartz JE; Broderick JE; Shiffman SS
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1340-6. PubMed ID: 16143666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetes.
    Bennett AV; Patrick DL; Bushnell DM; Chiou CF; Diehr P
    Qual Life Res; 2011 Jun; 20(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 21088912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of average weekly pain using recalled paper and momentary assessment electronic diary reports in children with arthritis.
    Stinson JN; Jibb LA; Lalloo C; Feldman BM; McGrath PJ; Petroz GC; Streiner D; Dupuis A; Gill N; Stevens BJ
    Clin J Pain; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1044-50. PubMed ID: 24535055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstructing the past on the Original Pain Recall Assessment form (OPRA).
    MacDonald S; Linton SJ; Jansson-Fröjmark M
    J Pain; 2009 Aug; 10(8):809-17. PubMed ID: 19638328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.