These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20620840)

  • 1. Vertical-dimension control during en-masse retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 20620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment.
    Hong RK; Heo JM; Ha YK
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):129-41. PubMed ID: 15747828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
    Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction.
    Chung KR; Nelson G; Kim SH; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 17628258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.
    Nagaraj K; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 18575310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S15-23. PubMed ID: 25138361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional retraction of anterior teeth with orthodontic miniplates in patients with temporomandibular disorder.
    Nelson G; Ahn HW; Jeong SH; Kim JS; Kim SH; Chung KR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Nov; 142(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 23116513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. En-masse retraction.
    Sethi P; Saxena R; Keluskar KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):723; author reply 723-4. PubMed ID: 18068579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated mini-implants: biocreative therapy type I technique.
    Chung KR; Kim SH; Kook YA; Son JH
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18575303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique.
    Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.