BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20621010)

  • 1. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomies.
    Behera MA; Likes CE; Judd JP; Barnett JC; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 22100443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoyte L; Rabbanifard R; Mezzich J; Bassaly R; Downes K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 23143426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Surgical treatment of prolapse using coelioscopic promontofixation: techniques and results].
    Wagner L; Boileau L; Delmas V; Haab F; Costa P
    Prog Urol; 2009 Dec; 19(13):994-1005. PubMed ID: 19969270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic surgery.
    Schreuder HW; Verheijen RH
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):198-213. PubMed ID: 19076952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in urologic surgery in the USA.
    Sleeper J; Lotan Y
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 Jan; 8(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 21158544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Anger JT; Mueller ER; Tarnay C; Smith B; Stroupe K; Rosenman A; Brubaker L; Bresee C; Kenton K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24463657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
    Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?
    Rowe CK; Pierce MW; Tecci KC; Houck CS; Mandell J; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):871-7. PubMed ID: 22283146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Elliott CS; Hsieh MH; Sokol ER; Comiter CV; Payne CK; Chen B
    J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):638-43. PubMed ID: 22177180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.