These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20621024)

  • 1. Effect of surface treatments on the fatigue life of titanium for biomedical applications.
    Pazos L; Corengia P; Svoboda H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Aug; 3(6):416-24. PubMed ID: 20621024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of shot blasting and heat treatment on the fatigue behavior of titanium for dental implant applications.
    Javier Gil F; Planell JA; Padrós A; Aparicio C
    Dent Mater; 2007 Apr; 23(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 16620949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of oxidation treatment on fatigue and fatigue-induced damage of commercially pure titanium.
    Leinenbach C; Eifler D
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Sep; 5(7):2810-9. PubMed ID: 19394905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols.
    Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semi-conducting properties of titanium dioxide surfaces on titanium implants.
    Petersson IU; Löberg JE; Fredriksson AS; Ahlberg EK
    Biomaterials; 2009 Sep; 30(27):4471-9. PubMed ID: 19524291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
    Fawzy AS; Amer MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatigue and cyclic deformation behaviour of surface-modified titanium alloys in simulated physiological media.
    Leinenbach C; Eifler D
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(8):1200-8. PubMed ID: 16140373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
    Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical assessment of grit blasting surface treatments of dental implants.
    Shemtov-Yona K; Rittel D; Dorogoy A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():375-90. PubMed ID: 25173238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of bulk microstructure of commercially pure titanium on surface characteristics and fatigue properties after surface modification by sand blasting and acid-etching.
    Medvedev AE; Ng HP; Lapovok R; Estrin Y; Lowe TC; Anumalasetty VN
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Apr; 57():55-68. PubMed ID: 26703365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of grade and surface topography of commercially pure titanium on fatigue properties.
    Suzuki K; Takano T; Takemoto S; Ueda T; Yoshinari M; Sakurai K
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 28954943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement of the fatigue life of titanium alloys for biomedical devices through microstructural control.
    Niinomi M; Akahori T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Jul; 7(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 20583885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone.
    Wong M; Eulenberger J; Schenk R; Hunziker E
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1567-75. PubMed ID: 8600147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
    Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
    Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of precoating surface treatments on fatigue of Ti-6A1-4V.
    Eberhardt AW; Kim BS; Rigney ED; Kutner GL; Harte CR
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 7492807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.