432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20621403)
1. Immediate postoperative outcome of orthognathic surgical planning, and prediction of positional changes in hard and soft tissue, independently of the extent and direction of the surgical corrections required.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 20621403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning.
Marchetti C; Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Sarti A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21030211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of two-dimensional planning for routine orthognathic surgery.
Rustemeyer J; Groddeck A; Zwerger S; Bremerich A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 48(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 19632014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients.
Chew MT
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):959-63. PubMed ID: 16448238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Chua HD; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft tissue profile changes after setback genioplasty in orthognathic surgery patients.
Park JY; Kim MJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):657-64. PubMed ID: 23395297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.
Mankad B; Cisneros GJ; Freeman K; Eisig SB
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10337247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Hillerup S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery?
Sharifi A; Jones R; Ayoub A; Moos K; Walker F; Khambay B; McHugh S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 18760569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Facial soft-tissue changes in skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients analyzed with 3-dimensional laser scanning.
Baik HS; Kim SY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 20691358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonorthodontic orthognathic surgery.
Schleich AR; Eppley BL
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1478-83. PubMed ID: 19816282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medial canthal region as an external reference point in orthognathic surgery.
Gil JN; Campos FE; Claus JD; Gil LF; Marin C; de Freitas SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):352-5. PubMed ID: 21122967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II.
de Lira Ade L; de Moura WL; Artese F; Bittencourt MA; Nojima LI
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23201327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages.
Mavili ME; Canter HI; Saglam-Aydinatay B
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 19745712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective assessment of maxillary advancement effects: maxillary incisor exposure, and upper lip and nasal changes.
Khamashta-Ledezma L; Naini FB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):454-64. PubMed ID: 25836005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
