308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20621740)
1. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
Godard O; Fiori N
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex and hemispheric differences in facial invariants extraction.
Godard O; Fiori N
Laterality; 2012; 17(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 22385142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex differences in callosal transfer and hemispheric specialization for face coding.
Proverbio AM; Mazzara R; Riva F; Manfredi M
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2325-32. PubMed ID: 22727879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateralized repetition priming for familiar faces: Evidence for asymmetric interhemispheric cooperation.
Bourne VJ; Hole GJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1117-33. PubMed ID: 16885146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateralised repetition priming for featurally and configurally manipulated familiar faces: evidence for differentially lateralised processing mechanisms.
Bourne VJ; Vladeanu M; Hole GJ
Laterality; 2009 May; 14(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 18949655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Selection of visual hierarchical stimuli between global and local aspects in men and women].
Razumnikova OM; Vol'f NV
Fiziol Cheloveka; 2011; 37(2):14-9. PubMed ID: 21542313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Priming vs. rhyming: orthographic and phonological representations in the left and right hemispheres.
Lindell AK; Lum JA
Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 18556102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces.
Ino T; Nakai R; Azuma T; Kimura T; Fukuyama H
Brain Imaging Behav; 2010 Mar; 4(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 20503114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemisphere-dependent holistic processing of familiar faces.
Ramon M; Rossion B
Brain Cogn; 2012 Feb; 78(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 22099150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
Keyes H; Brady N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining the relationship between degree of handedness and degree of cerebral lateralization for processing facial emotion.
Bourne VJ
Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 18444713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
Nakamura K; Oga T; Takahashi M; Kuribayashi T; Kanamori Y; Matsumiya T; Maeno Y; Yamamoto M
Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric metacontrol and cerebral dominance in healthy individuals investigated by means of chimeric faces.
Urgesi C; Bricolo E; Aglioti SM
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 16099363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of aging and exposure duration on perceptual biases in chimeric face processing.
Butler SH; Harvey M
Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 18472036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-face enhances processing of immediately preceding invisible faces.
Pannese A; Hirsch J
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):564-73. PubMed ID: 21168427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
Baird LM; Burton AM
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
