BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20621740)

  • 21. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining the hemispheric distribution of semantic information using lateralised priming of familiar faces.
    Vladeanu M; Bourne VJ
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):420-5. PubMed ID: 18977064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Take it to the bridge: an interhemispheric processing advantage for emotional faces.
    Compton RJ; Feigenson K; Widick P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 15922159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effect of unilateral right hemisphere lesions upon recognition of faces tachistoscopically presented to the left hemisphere].
    Anzola GP
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(14):1433-9. PubMed ID: 7004465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion.
    Coolican J; Eskes GA; McMullen PA; Lecky E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 17720290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural correlates of spatial frequency processing: A neuropsychological approach.
    Peyrin C; Chokron S; Guyader N; Gout O; Moret J; Marendaz C
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():1-10. PubMed ID: 16443206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tone probe event-related potential differences during a face recognition task in prepubertal children and Turner Syndrome girls.
    Everhart DE; Shucard JL; Quatrin T; Shucard DW
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2004 Nov; 29(10):1260-71. PubMed ID: 15288705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Valence specific laterality effects in free viewing conditions: the role of expectancy and gender of image.
    Stafford LD; Brandaro N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 20934796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A bias for the female face in the right hemisphere.
    Parente R; Tommasi L
    Laterality; 2008 Jul; 13(4):374-86. PubMed ID: 18592434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Involvement of low-level visual areas in hemispheric superiority for face processing.
    Sung YW; Someya Y; Eriko Y; Choi SH; Cho ZH; Ogawa S
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1390():118-25. PubMed ID: 21443866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.
    Liu L; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERP study of viewpoint-independence in familiar-face recognition.
    Miyakoshi M; Kanayama N; Nomura M; Iidaka T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 18474403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A bilateral occipitotemporal network mediates face perception.
    Minnebusch DA; Suchan B; Köster O; Daum I
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 19041896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Category-specific organization of prefrontal response-facilitation during priming.
    Bunzeck N; Schütze H; Düzel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1765-76. PubMed ID: 16701731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Angry faces are special too: evidence from the visual scanpath.
    Bate S; Haslam C; Hodgson TL
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Sep; 23(5):658-67. PubMed ID: 19702419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.