These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20623212)

  • 1. Relative precision of inhaler aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) metrics by full resolution and abbreviated andersen cascade impactors (ACIs): part 2--investigation of bias in extra-fine mass fraction with AIM-HRT impactor.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Doyle CC; Ali RS; Avvakoumova VI; Christopher JD; Quiroz J; Strickland H; Tougas T; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2010 Sep; 11(3):1115-8. PubMed ID: 20623212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative precision of inhaler aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) metrics by full resolution and abbreviated andersen cascade impactors (ACIs): part 1.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Doyle CC; Ali RS; Avvakoumova VI; Christopher JD; Quiroz J; Strickland H; Tougas T; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2010 Jun; 11(2):843-51. PubMed ID: 20480271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept: part 1--Influence of particle bounce and re-entrainment-evaluation with a "dry" pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)-based formulation.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Avvakoumova V; MacKay H; Ali R
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2009; 10(1):243-51. PubMed ID: 19280348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept: part II--Influence of evaporation of a volatile component-evaluation with a "droplet-producing" pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)-based formulation containing ethanol as cosolvent.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Avvakoumova V; MacKay H; Ali R
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2009; 10(1):252-7. PubMed ID: 19291411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Abbreviated Impactor Measurements (AIM) and Efficient Data Analysis (EDA) for Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Against the Full-Resolution Next Generation Impactor (NGI).
    Mohan M; Lee S; Guo C; Peri SP; Doub WH
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2017 Jul; 18(5):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 27624069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adapting the Abbreviated Impactor Measurement (AIM) concept to make appropriate inhaler aerosol measurements to compare with clinical data: a scoping study with the "Alberta" idealized throat (AIT) inlet.
    Mitchell J; Copley M; Sizer Y; Russell T; Solomon D
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2012 Aug; 25(4):188-97. PubMed ID: 22857270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Multi-laboratory in Vitro Study to Compare Data from Abbreviated and Pharmacopeial Impactor Measurements for Orally Inhaled Products: a Report of the European Aerosol Group (EPAG).
    Nichols SC; Mitchell JP; Sandell D; Andersson PU; Fischer M; Howald M; Pengilley R; Krüger P
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2016 Dec; 17(6):1383-1392. PubMed ID: 26762338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aerodynamic particle size analysis of aerosols from pressurized metered-dose inhalers: comparison of Andersen 8-stage cascade impactor, next generation pharmaceutical impactor, and model 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer aerosol spectrometer.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Wiersema KJ; Doyle CC
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2003 Oct; 4(4):E54. PubMed ID: 15198549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution Between a Next Generation Impactor and a Cascade Impactor at a Range of Flow Rates.
    Yoshida H; Kuwana A; Shibata H; Izutsu KI; Goda Y
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2017 Apr; 18(3):646-653. PubMed ID: 27173989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution by Multi-Stage Cascade Impactor: International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation & Science (IPAC-RS) Recommendations to Support Both Product Quality Control and Clinical Programs.
    Mitchell JP; Stein SW; Doub W; Goodey AP; Christopher JD; Patel RB; Tougas TP; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2019 May; 20(5):206. PubMed ID: 31147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of an abbreviated impactor for fine particle fraction (FPF) determination of metered dose inhalers (MDI).
    Guo C; Ngo D; Ahadi S; Doub WH
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2013 Sep; 14(3):1004-11. PubMed ID: 23780781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminating Ability of Abbreviated Impactor Measurement Approach (AIM) to Detect Changes in Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) of an Albuterol/Salbutamol pMDI Aerosol.
    David Christopher J; Patel RB; Mitchell JP; Tougas TP; Goodey AP; Quiroz J; Andersson PU; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2017 Nov; 18(8):3296-3306. PubMed ID: 28589305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addressing the Need for Controls on Particle Bounce and Re-entrainment in the Cascade Impactor and for the Mitigation of Electrostatic Charge for Aerodynamic Particle Size Assessment of Orally Inhaled Products: an Assessment by the International Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS).
    Doub W; Stein S; Mitchell J; Goodey AP
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2020 Aug; 21(7):239. PubMed ID: 32827121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of sampling volume on dry powder inhaler (DPI)-emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSDs) measured by the Next-Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI) and the Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI).
    Mohammed H; Roberts DL; Copley M; Hammond M; Nichols SC; Mitchell JP
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2012 Sep; 13(3):875-82. PubMed ID: 22678745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Particle Size Measurements from Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products.
    Mitchell JP
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2021 Dec; 34(6):325-345. PubMed ID: 34860563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of the Performance of Efficient Data Analysis Versus Fine Particle Dose as Metrics for the Quality Control of Aerodynamic Particle Size Distributions of Orally Inhaled Pharmaceuticals.
    Tougas TP; Goodey AP; Hardwell G; Mitchell J; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2017 Feb; 18(2):451-461. PubMed ID: 27068528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal Volumes of Pharmaceutical Compendial Induction Port, Next-Generation Impactor With and Without Its Pre-separator, and Several Configurations of the Andersen Cascade Impactor With and Without Pre-separator.
    Roberts DL; Chambers F; Copley M; Mitchell JP
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2020 Aug; 33(4):214-229. PubMed ID: 32101074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissolution of fine particle fraction from truncated Anderson cascade impactor with an enhancer cell.
    Tay JYS; Liew CV; Heng PWS
    Int J Pharm; 2018 Jul; 545(1-2):45-50. PubMed ID: 29689370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of nonideal cascade impactor stage collection efficiency curves on the interpretation of the size of inhaler-generated aerosols.
    Roberts DL; Mitchell JP
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2013 Jun; 14(2):497-510. PubMed ID: 23508617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved quality control metrics for cascade impaction measurements of orally inhaled drug products (OIPs).
    Tougas TP; Christopher D; Mitchell JP; Strickland H; Wyka B; Van Oort M; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2009; 10(4):1276-85. PubMed ID: 19882251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.