These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20623288)

  • 1. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
    Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
    World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
    Kim BS; Kim TH; Kwon TG; Yoo ES
    Yonsei Med J; 2012 May; 53(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
    Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Schnall M; Malkowicz SB; Tomaszewski JE; Schultz D; Wein A
    Cancer; 1995 May; 75(9):2368-72. PubMed ID: 7536124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [MRI staging of prostate cancer with the combined endorectal body phased-array coil and histologic correlation].
    Pegios W; Bentas W; Wittmann L; Mack MG; Zangos S; Söllner O; Binder J; Fellbaum C; Jonas D; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1660-6. PubMed ID: 14661137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
    Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of percent positive biopsies and endorectal coil MRI in predicting prognosis in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Schnall M; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(6):343-50. PubMed ID: 9166555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
    Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
    Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
    Wang L; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Schwartz LH; Eberhardt SC; Chen HN; Scardino PT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16498101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does endorectal coil MRI increase the accuracy of preoperative prostate cancer staging?
    Pooli A; Isharwal S; Cook G; Oliveto JM; LaGrange CA
    Can J Urol; 2016 Dec; 23(6):8564-8567. PubMed ID: 27995852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
    Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
    Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
    Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
    Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of endorectal coil MRI in patient selection and treatment planning for prostate seed implants.
    Clarke DH; Banks SJ; Wiederhorn AR; Klousia JW; Lissy JM; Miller M; Able AM; Artiles C; Hindle WV; Blair DN; Houk RR; Sheridan MJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):903-10. PubMed ID: 11958882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The predictability of T3 disease in staging MRI following prostate biopsy decreases in patients with high initial PSA and Gleason score.
    Hwii Ko Y; Jae Sung D; Gu Kang S; Ho Kang S; Gu Lee J; Jong Kim J; Cheon J
    Asian J Androl; 2011 May; 13(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 21383671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.
    Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
    Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.