These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20623796)

  • 1. Judging intoxication.
    Rubenzer S
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(1):116-37. PubMed ID: 20623796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical evaluation of standardized field sobriety tests.
    Hlastala MP; Polissar NL; Oberman S
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):662-9. PubMed ID: 15932104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sleep deprivation does not mimic alcohol intoxication on field sobriety testing.
    Citek K; Elmont AD; Jons CL; Krezelok CJ; Neron JD; Plummer TA; Tannenbaum T
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1170-9. PubMed ID: 21595697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The need for drugged driving per se laws: a commentary.
    DuPont RL; Voas RB; Walsh JM; Shea C; Talpins SK; Neil MM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22239141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.
    Stuster J
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):608-14. PubMed ID: 17063973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new look at NHTSA's evaluation of the 1984 Charlottesville Sobriety Checkpoint Program: implications for current checkpoint issues.
    Voas RB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Mar; 9(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 18338291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Production of intoxication states by actors: perception by lay listeners.
    Hollien H; DeJong G; Martin CA
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Nov; 43(6):1153-62. PubMed ID: 9846392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prescription drugs, drugged driving and per se laws.
    Voas RB; DuPont RL; Shea CL; Talpins SK
    Inj Prev; 2013 Jun; 19(3):218-21. PubMed ID: 23024170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field sobriety tests: are they designed for failure?
    Cole S; Nowaczyk RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 1):99-104. PubMed ID: 7991338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Limitations in medico-legal appraisal of sobriety or alcohol intoxication in drivers and the use of retrospective calculation. Practical comments based on an analysis of the files investigated in the chair of forensic medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, in the years 2000-2004].
    Rygol K; Kabiesz-Neniczka S
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 17691180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethanol Forensic Toxicology.
    Perry PJ; Doroudgar S; Van Dyke P
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2017 Dec; 45(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 29282233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between performance on the standardised field sobriety tests, driving performance and the level of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in blood.
    Papafotiou K; Carter JD; Stough C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(2-3):172-8. PubMed ID: 16226154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of reducing illegal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limits for driving: evidence for lowering the limit to .05 BAC.
    Fell JC; Voas RB
    J Safety Res; 2006; 37(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 16824545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drugs and driving: the Finnish perspective.
    Lillsunde P; Gunnar T
    Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):213-29. PubMed ID: 21338023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intervening to decrease the probability of alcohol-impaired driving: Impact of novel field sobriety tests.
    Smith RC; Robinson Z; Bazdar A; Geller ES
    J Prev Interv Community; 2016; 44(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 27309028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of the passive alcohol sensor for estimating BACs in DWI-enforcement operations.
    Voas RB; Romano E; Peck R
    J Stud Alcohol; 2006 Sep; 67(5):714-21. PubMed ID: 16847540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the use and benefit of passive alcohol sensors during routine traffic stops.
    Fell JC; Compton C
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():437-48. PubMed ID: 18184506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying drunkenness in the night-time economy.
    Perham N; Moore SC; Shepherd J; Cusens B
    Addiction; 2007 Mar; 102(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 17298644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alcohol biomarkers as tools to guide and support decisions about intoxicated driver risk.
    Bean P; Roska C; Harasymiw J; Pearson J; Kay B; Louks H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 10(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 19916121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving.
    Graham K; Miller P; Chikritzhs T; Bellis MA; Clapp JD; Hughes K; Toomey TL; Wells S
    Addiction; 2014 May; 109(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 23796349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.