These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20624180)

  • 1. The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals.
    Sullivan-Beckers L; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3158-71. PubMed ID: 20624180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LE; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 15119440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence.
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LM; Snyder RL; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18005157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local population density and group composition influence the signal-preference relationship in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Fowler-Finn KD; Cruz DC; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 27749022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling complex phenotypes: generalized linear models using spectrogram predictors of animal communication signals.
    Holan SH; Wikle CK; Sullivan-Beckers LE; Cocroft RB
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):914-24. PubMed ID: 19764952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
    Rodríguez RL; Hallett AC; Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 23252651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):602-10. PubMed ID: 25611556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks.
    Boughman JW
    Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6840):944-8. PubMed ID: 11418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation.
    Arnegard ME; McIntyre PB; Harmon LJ; Zelditch ML; Crampton WG; Davis JK; Sullivan JP; Lavoué S; Hopkins CD
    Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):335-56. PubMed ID: 20653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coevolution of male mating signal and female preference during early lineage divergence of the Hawaiian cricket, Laupala cerasina.
    Grace JL; Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2184-96. PubMed ID: 21790568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects.
    Rodríguez RL; Ramaswamy K; Cocroft RB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1601):2585-93. PubMed ID: 17002943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
    Chaine AS; Lyon BE
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing the effects of familiarity, relatedness, and color pattern rarity on attractiveness and measuring their effects on sexual selection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
    Zajitschek SR; Brooks RC
    Am Nat; 2008 Dec; 172(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 18983251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female mate choice of male signals is unlikely to promote ecological adaptation in
    Fowler-Finn KD; Kilmer JT; Cruz DC; Rodríguez RL
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 8(4):2146-2159. PubMed ID: 29468032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Gries R; Gries G
    Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):309-27. PubMed ID: 16900317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.