257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20624180)
1. The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals.
Sullivan-Beckers L; Cocroft RB
Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3158-71. PubMed ID: 20624180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LE; Cocroft RB
Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 15119440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence.
Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LM; Snyder RL; Cocroft RB
Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18005157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.
Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local population density and group composition influence the signal-preference relationship in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
Fowler-Finn KD; Cruz DC; Rodríguez RL
J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 27749022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling complex phenotypes: generalized linear models using spectrogram predictors of animal communication signals.
Holan SH; Wikle CK; Sullivan-Beckers LE; Cocroft RB
Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):914-24. PubMed ID: 19764952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
Rodríguez RL; Hallett AC; Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD
J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 23252651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes.
Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):602-10. PubMed ID: 25611556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks.
Boughman JW
Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6840):944-8. PubMed ID: 11418857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation.
Arnegard ME; McIntyre PB; Harmon LJ; Zelditch ML; Crampton WG; Davis JK; Sullivan JP; Lavoué S; Hopkins CD
Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):335-56. PubMed ID: 20653442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coevolution of male mating signal and female preference during early lineage divergence of the Hawaiian cricket, Laupala cerasina.
Grace JL; Shaw KL
Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2184-96. PubMed ID: 21790568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
Doebeli M
J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects.
Rodríguez RL; Ramaswamy K; Cocroft RB
Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1601):2585-93. PubMed ID: 17002943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
Chaine AS; Lyon BE
Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinguishing the effects of familiarity, relatedness, and color pattern rarity on attractiveness and measuring their effects on sexual selection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
Zajitschek SR; Brooks RC
Am Nat; 2008 Dec; 172(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 18983251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Female mate choice of male signals is unlikely to promote ecological adaptation in
Fowler-Finn KD; Kilmer JT; Cruz DC; Rodríguez RL
Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 8(4):2146-2159. PubMed ID: 29468032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.
Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Gries R; Gries G
Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):309-27. PubMed ID: 16900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
