These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Laboratory evaluations of a toothbrush with diamond-shaped filaments for stiffness and efficacy. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Loudin S; Homan G; Nelson CF J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(4):112-5. PubMed ID: 11507920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the Dr. SEDOC and ADA toothbrushes in three independent laboratory procedures. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Kang HC J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 15218714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two toothbrushes with cross-angulated bristling. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Bosma ML; Camargo PM J Clin Dent; 2000; 11(2):60-2. PubMed ID: 11460285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory efficacy of three compact toothbrushes to reduce artificial plaque in hard to reach areas. Yankell SL; Barnes CM; Shi X; Cwik J Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 22016911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three laboratory assessments of a new triple-head toothbrush and the Oral-B 40 toothbrush. Emling RC; Yankell SL; Shi X; Smith JC J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 15974217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory evaluations of two toothbrushes for removal of artificial plaque above, around and below the gingival margin. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12619266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes. Battista GW; Petrone DM J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory evaluations of two battery-powered toothbrushes and a manual toothbrush for efficacy and safety. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Blatz B; Biesbrock AR J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 12518487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory evaluations of a bi-level, extremely tapered bristled toothbrush and a conventional uniform bristled toothbrush. Barnes CM; Covey DA; Shi X; Yankell SL Am J Dent; 2009 Apr; 22(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 19626970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory assessment of the Sensodyne Mikro Aktiv extra soft toothbrush and the Oral-B indicator soft toothbrush. Emling RC; Shi X; Yankell SL; Smith JC J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 18763687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Oral-B CrossAction manual toothbrush: a 5-year literature review. Cugini M; Warren PR J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 May; 72(4):323. PubMed ID: 16684475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(Suppl C):C5-8. PubMed ID: 1306675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy and gingival margin cleaning of the elmex SENSITIVE SOFT, EXTRA SOFT and ADA reference toothbrushes. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 17410953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]