These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20624454)

  • 1. Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program.
    Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Schepky A; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Reisinger K; Tailhardat M; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Winkler P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1465-73. PubMed ID: 20624454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin sensitisation: the Colipa strategy for developing and evaluating non-animal test methods for risk assessment.
    Maxwell G; Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Diembeck W; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Schroeder K; Tailhardat M; Teissier S; Winkler P
    ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21311850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.
    Sakaguchi H; Ryan C; Ovigne JM; Schroeder KR; Ashikaga T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1810-20. PubMed ID: 20510347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization.
    Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test--human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Sakaguchi H; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Kosaka N; Ito Y; Yoneyama K; Sono S; Itagaki H; Toyoda H; Suzuki H
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 18204907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
    Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT.
    Sakaguchi H; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Yoshida Y; Ito Y; Yoneyama K; Hirota M; Itagaki H; Toyoda H; Suzuki H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Aug; 20(5):774-84. PubMed ID: 16337770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Hirota M; Sakaguchi H; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1150-60. PubMed ID: 22796097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a new in vitro skin sensitization assay (Epidermal Sensitization Assay; EpiSensA) using reconstructed human epidermis.
    Saito K; Nukada Y; Takenouchi O; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Dec; 27(8):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23999411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The incorporation of lysine into the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay for skin sensitization assessments.
    Troutman JA; Foertsch LM; Kern PS; Dai HJ; Quijano M; Dobson RL; Lalko JF; Lepoittevin JP; Gerberick GF
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Aug; 122(2):422-36. PubMed ID: 21555337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expression of surface markers on the human monocytic leukaemia cell line, THP-1, as indicators for the sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    An S; Kim S; Huh Y; Lee TR; Kim HK; Park KL; Eun HC
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 19338585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Mugita N; Hirota M; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):343-53. PubMed ID: 21767275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment.
    Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Gildea LA; Hulette BC; Betts CJ; Cumberbatch M; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Toxicol Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16014741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fluorescence high throughput screening method for the detection of reactive electrophiles as potential skin sensitizers.
    Avonto C; Chittiboyina AG; Rua D; Khan IA
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 289(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 26455772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. LC-MS-based characterization of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to improve the in vitro prediction of the skin sensitization potential.
    Natsch A; Gfeller H
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Dec; 106(2):464-78. PubMed ID: 18791182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guiding principles for the implementation of non-animal safety assessment approaches for cosmetics: skin sensitisation.
    Goebel C; Aeby P; Ade N; Alépée N; Aptula A; Araki D; Dufour E; Gilmour N; Hibatallah J; Keller D; Kern P; Kirst A; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Rowland J; Safford B; Schellauf F; Schepky A; Seaman C; Teichert T; Tessier N; Teissier S; Weltzien HU; Winkler P; Scheel J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 22374415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro human skin test for assessing sensitization potential.
    Ahmed SS; Wang XN; Fielding M; Kerry A; Dickinson I; Munuswamy R; Kimber I; Dickinson AM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 May; 36(5):669-84. PubMed ID: 26251951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials.
    Mehling A; Eriksson T; Eltze T; Kolle S; Ramirez T; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 86(8):1273-95. PubMed ID: 22707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.