137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20625219)
1. [Comparison of RTPS and Monte Carlo dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms for photon beams].
Nakaguchi Y; Araki F; Maruyama M; Fukuda S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Apr; 66(4):322-33. PubMed ID: 20625219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport method with Monte Carlo and model-based convolution methods in heterogeneous media.
Han T; Mikell JK; Salehpour M; Mourtada F
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2651-64. PubMed ID: 21776802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Gagné IM; Zavgorodni S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 8(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 17592451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Hardcastle N; Oborn BM; Haworth A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):99-110. PubMed ID: 27685114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy.
Ding W; Johnston PN; Wong TP; Bubb IF
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):39-48. PubMed ID: 15462585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of six TPS algorithms in computing entrance and exit doses.
Tan YI; Metwaly M; Glegg M; Baggarley S; Elliott A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):229–240. PubMed ID: 24892349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning.
Craig J; Oliver M; Gladwish A; Mulligan M; Chen J; Wong E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 9(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 18714276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator.
Sterpin E; Tomsej M; De Smedt B; Reynaert N; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1665-77. PubMed ID: 17555248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in heterogeneous media.
Zhang P; Simon A; De Crevoisier R; Haigron P; Nassef MH; Li B; Shu H
Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):765-73. PubMed ID: 24954922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
