These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20625326)
1. Comparison between MRI and myelography in lumbar spinal canal stenosis for the decision of levels of decompression surgery. Morita M; Miyauchi A; Okuda S; Oda T; Iwasaki M J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20625326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI. Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography? Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis? Sasaki K; Hasegawa K; Shimoda H; Keiji I; Homma T Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of postoperative MR imaging in the determination of level and side of lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Wanivenhaus F; Buck FM; Betz M; Farshad-Amacker NA; Farshad M Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):581-585. PubMed ID: 27516606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology. Naganawa T; Miyamoto K; Ogura H; Suzuki N; Shimizu K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20581762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool? Song KJ; Choi BW; Kim GH; Kim JR J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 19525791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis. Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography for quantitative evaluation of lumbar intracanalar cross-section. Ogura H; Miyamoto K; Fukuta S; Naganawa T; Shimizu K Yonsei Med J; 2011 Jan; 52(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 21155046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for adjacent segment pathology requiring additional surgery after single-level spinal fusion: impact of pre-existing spinal stenosis demonstrated by preoperative myelography. Yugué I; Okada S; Masuda M; Ueta T; Maeda T; Shiba K Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 26272373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical results in hidden lumbar spinal stenosis detected by axial loaded computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an outcome study. Willén J; Wessberg PJ; Danielsson B Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):E109-15. PubMed ID: 18277859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Spinal Canal Stenosis: Classification of Lateral Region of Lumbar Spinal Canal and Surgical Approaches. Wang Y; Dou Q; Yang J; Zhang L; Yan Y; Peng Z; Guo C; Kong Q World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e276-e283. PubMed ID: 30053559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up. Kikuike K; Miyamoto K; Hosoe H; Shimizu K J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 19956034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observer variability in the evaluation of multiple lumbar stenosis by routine MR--myelography and MRI. Song KS; Jang EC; Jung HJ; Kim KW; Yu H J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 19057250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital computed tomography evaluation of spinal canal and dural sac before and after surgical decompression of lumbar stenosis. Rapała K; Chaberek S; Truszczyńska A; Łukawski S; Walczak P Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20453251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Anamnesis and myelography in the preoperative assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Results of a postoperative follow-up study]. Jeanneret B; Forster T Orthopade; 1993 Aug; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 8414479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]