These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20625765)

  • 1. The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response-effect compatibility.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2011 May; 75(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 20625765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).
    Puffe L; Dittrich K; Klauer KC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184844. PubMed ID: 28910413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice effects vs. transfer effects in the Simon task.
    D'Ascenzo S; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 32770264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: a comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Kerzel D; Buetti S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22454332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The premotor theory of attention as an account for the Simon effect.
    Van der Lubbe RH; Abrahamse EL; De Kleine E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 22426428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 21858664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.
    Schaeffner S; Koch I; Philipp AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():210-218. PubMed ID: 30312892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action.
    Porcu E; Bölling L; Lappe M; Liepelt R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):972-7. PubMed ID: 27016344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Conde EF; Fraga-Filho RS; Lameira AP; Mograbi DC; Riggio L; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametric exploration of the Simon effect across visual space.
    Klein RM; Dove ME; Ivanoff J; Eskes GA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 17133887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: comparison of effects in a Relevant Stimulus-Response Compatibility task and an approach/avoidance Simon task.
    Field M; Caren R; Fernie G; De Houwer J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2011 Dec; 25(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 21534644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.