115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20625843)
1. Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian Provinces.
Simunovic M; Urbach D; Major D; Sutradhar R; Baxter N; To T; Brown A; Davis D; Levine MN
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):2537-44. PubMed ID: 20625843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A tale of two provinces: regionalization of pancreatic surgery in Ontario and Quebec.
Sonnenday CJ; Birkmeyer JD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):2535-6. PubMed ID: 20499281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality improvement for pancreatic cancer care: is regionalization a feasible and effective mechanism?
Raval MV; Bilimoria KY; Talamonti MS
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2010 Apr; 19(2):371-90. PubMed ID: 20159520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A tale of two provinces: regionalization of pancreatic surgery in Ontario and Quebec.
Simunovic M; Baxter N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18 Suppl 3():S230. PubMed ID: 21249456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.
Gasper WJ; Glidden DV; Jin C; Way LW; Patti MG
Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 19730178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A qualitative assessment of a provincial quality improvement strategy for pancreatic cancer surgery.
Wright FC; Fitch M; Coates AJ; Simunovic M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):629-35. PubMed ID: 20878248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regionalization versus competition in complex cancer surgery.
Ho V; Town RJ; Heslin MJ
Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Jan; 2(Pt 1):51-71. PubMed ID: 18634671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appropriateness of primary total hip and knee replacements in regions of Ontario with high and low utilization rates.
van Walraven CV; Paterson JM; Kapral M; Chan B; Bell M; Hawker G; Gollish J; Schatzker J; Williams JI; Naylor CD
CMAJ; 1996 Sep; 155(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 8823215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public versus private institutional performance reporting: what is mandatory for quality improvement?
Guru V; Fremes SE; Naylor CD; Austin PC; Shrive FM; Ghali WA; Tu JV;
Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):573-8. PubMed ID: 16923433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery.
Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Feinglass JM; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Talamonti MS; Ko CY
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 26(28):4626-33. PubMed ID: 18574159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.
Jamal SM; Shrive FM; Ghali WA; Knudtson ML; Eisenberg MJ;
Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 12813611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.
Schrag D; Earle C; Xu F; Panageas KS; Yabroff KR; Bristow RE; Trimble EL; Warren JL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 16449676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system.
Simunovic M; To T; Theriault M; Langer B
CMAJ; 1999 Mar; 160(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 10101998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of regionalization on outcome in pulmonary lobectomy: a Canadian national study.
Finley CJ; Bendzsak A; Tomlinson G; Keshavjee S; Urbach DR; Darling GE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 140(4):757-63. PubMed ID: 20850656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.
Glasgow RE; Mulvihill SJ
West J Med; 1996 Nov; 165(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 8993200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection.
Eppsteiner RW; Csikesz NG; McPhee JT; Tseng JF; Shah SA
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):635-40. PubMed ID: 19300225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Major pancreatic resections for suspected cancer in a community-based teaching hospital: lessons learned.
Metreveli RE; Sahm K; Abdel-Misih R; Petrelli NJ
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 95(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 17323334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. National variation in operative mortality rates for esophageal resection and the need for quality improvement.
Dimick JB; Cowan JA; Ailawadi G; Wainess RM; Upchurch GR
Arch Surg; 2003 Dec; 138(12):1305-9. PubMed ID: 14662529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.
Zacharias A; Schwann TA; Riordan CJ; Durham SJ; Shah A; Papadimos TJ; Engoren M; Habib RH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1961-9. PubMed ID: 15919292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A decade of mortality reductions in major oncologic surgery: the impact of centralization and quality improvement.
Learn PA; Bach PB
Med Care; 2010 Dec; 48(12):1041-9. PubMed ID: 20966781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
