These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20626699)

  • 21. [The decision-making process and information needs among women seeking abortion. Results from 2 studies conducted with a 10-year interval, 1983-93].
    Skjeldestad FE
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Aug; 114(19):2276-9. PubMed ID: 7992297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Walking on a tightrope-Caring for ambivalent women considering abortions in the first trimester.
    Kjelsvik M; Tveit Sekse RJ; Moi AL; Aasen EM; Gjengedal E
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Nov; 27(21-22):4192-4202. PubMed ID: 29989231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors affecting decision making of low-income young women with unplanned pregnancies in Bangkok, Thailand.
    Naravage W; Vichit-Vadakan N; Sakulbumrungsil RC; Van der Putten M
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2005 May; 36(3):775-82. PubMed ID: 16124455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement].
    Lou S; Dahl K; Risør MB; Hvidman LE; Thomsen SG; Jørgensen FS; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):914-8. PubMed ID: 17359736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 3667248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The intersection of relational and cultural narratives: women's abortion experiences.
    McIntyre M; Anderson B; McDonald C
    Can J Nurs Res; 2001 Dec; 33(3):47-62. PubMed ID: 11845622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new approach to eliciting information about induced abortion.
    Huntington D; Mensch B; Toubia N
    Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 8390117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Partnership and pregnancy conflict].
    Roeder H; Sellschopp A; Henrich G
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1994 May; 44(5):153-8. PubMed ID: 8029379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Husbands' and wives' reports of women's decision-making power in Western Guatemala and their effects on preventive health behaviors.
    Becker S; Fonseca-Becker F; Schenck-Yglesias C
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 May; 62(9):2313-26. PubMed ID: 16307836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The long-term phenomena of women's postabortion experiences.
    Trybulski J
    West J Nurs Res; 2005 Aug; 27(5):559-76; comment 577-82. PubMed ID: 16020566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Young single women's experiences of pregnancy, adjustment, decision-making and ongoing identity construction.
    Seibold C
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 15177861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Induced abortion after the 12th week of pregnancy in the county of Arhus 1993-1994. Psychological consequences].
    Meyer L; Petersson BH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jul; 158(31):4395-8. PubMed ID: 8759996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decision-making about unwanted pregnancy.
    Törnbom M; Ingelhammar E; Lilja H; Svanberg B; Möller A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Aug; 78(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 10422912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Induced abortion in Kenya: case histories.
    Baker J; Khasiani S
    Stud Fam Plann; 1992; 23(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 1557793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study.
    Moffat MA; Bell JS; Porter MA; Lawton S; Hundley V; Danielian P; Bhattacharya S
    BJOG; 2007 Jan; 114(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17233863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Women and abortion: the past reaches into the present.
    Trybulski J
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jun; 54(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 16796660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.
    Finer LB; Frohwirth LF; Dauphinee LA; Singh S; Moore AM
    Contraception; 2006 Oct; 74(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 16982236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Having an abortion using mifepristone and home misoprostol: a qualitative analysis of women's experiences.
    Fielding SL; Edmunds E; Schaff EA
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2002; 34(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 11990637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How do prospective parents who decline prenatal screening account for their decision? A qualitative study.
    Gottfredsdóttir H; Björnsdóttir K; Sandall J
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jul; 69(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 19481846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.