200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20627226)
1. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite-element analysis of maxillary prostheses with implants. Design of number and position of implants for maxillary prostheses after hemimaxillectomy.
Miyamoto S; Ujigawa K; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1120-6. PubMed ID: 20627226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis of three zygomatic implant techniques for the severely atrophic edentulous maxilla.
Wen H; Guo W; Liang R; Xiang L; Long G; Wang T; Deng M; Tian W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 24314571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental Versus Zygomatic Implants in the Treatment of Maxillectomy: A Finite Element Analysis.
Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş İ; Kilic D; Kilic K
J Oral Implantol; 2024 Jun; 50(3):220-230. PubMed ID: 38839068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical 3-dimensional finite element analysis of obturator protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary defects.
Akay C; Yaluğ S
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Feb; 21():604-11. PubMed ID: 25714086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data.
Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Alveolar Bone Defects on the Stress Distribution in Quad Zygomatic Implant-Supported Maxillary Prosthesis.
Duan Y; Chandran R; Cherry D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 29763505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures.
Ujigawa K; Kato Y; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 17517497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The zygomatic implant: preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. A clinical report.
Bedrossian E; Stumpel L; Beckely ML; Indresano T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):861-5. PubMed ID: 12507247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of tilted versus nontilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the restoration of the edentuous mandible: a biomechanical study.
Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Taschieri S; Raimondi MT; Zampelis A; Francetti L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):511-7. PubMed ID: 19587875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "All-on-four" concept and immediate loading for simultaneous rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla and mandible with conventional and zygomatic implants.
Ferreira EJ; Kuabara MR; Gulinelli JL
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 48(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 19767132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of alveolar bone support on zygomatic implants in an extra-sinus position--a finite element analysis study.
Freedman M; Ring M; Stassen LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 44(6):785-90. PubMed ID: 25748609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of influence of different implant size and placement on stress distribution with 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Balkaya MC
Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 25290280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of prostheses retained with/without zygoma implants in maxillectomy patients.
Wang M; Qu X; Cao M; Wang D; Zhang C
J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(6):1155-61. PubMed ID: 23395509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of stability and functional stress with implant-supported maxillary obturator prostheses.
de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1578-84. PubMed ID: 25277029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges with Regular or Short Morse Taper Implants.
Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos MG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):372-376. PubMed ID: 28291862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
