These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20627764)

  • 1. [Estimation of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients].
    Koubaa A; Potier J; de Préneuf H; Queffelou G; Garcia F; Petitclerc T
    Nephrol Ther; 2010 Nov; 6(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 20627764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urea kinetic modeling in continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. Effect of body composition on the methods for estimating urea volume of distribution.
    Tzamaloukas AH; Murata GH; Malhotra D; Sena P; Patron A
    ASAIO J; 1993; 39(3):M359-62. PubMed ID: 8268559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance.
    Uhlin F; Fridolin I; Magnusson M; Lindberg LG
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2225-31. PubMed ID: 16611681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [How much body water volume affects evaluation of urea clearance in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis?].
    Jakić M; Mihaljević D; Zibar L
    Acta Med Croatica; 2004; 58(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15125390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of gender and body mass on hemodialysis dose].
    Kovacić V; Sain M; Dzanko D
    Acta Med Croatica; 2003; 57(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 12876860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Urea distribution volume calculated by ionic dialysance].
    Teruel JL; Merino JL; Fernández-Lucas M; Tenorio MT; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16649433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of total body water and urea kinetic modelling in peritoneal dialysis.
    Woodrow G; Oldroyd B; Turney JH; Davies PS; Day JM; Smith MA
    Clin Nephrol; 1997 Jan; 47(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 9021243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Control of the dialysis dose by ionic dialysance and bioimpedance].
    Teruel JL; Alvarez Rangel LE; Fernández Lucas M; Merino JL; Liaño F; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2007; 27(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 17402882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ionic dialysance and determination of Kt/V in on-line hemodiafiltration with simultaneous
pre- and post-dilution.
    Créput C; Toledano D; Petitclerc T
    Int J Artif Organs; 2013 May; 36(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 23504813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the ionic dialysance monitor on Kt measurement in hemodialysis.
    Maduell F; Vera M; Arias M; Serra N; Blasco M; Bergadá E; Fontsere N; Cases A; Campistol JM
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18455852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.
    Lindley EJ; Chamney PW; Wuepper A; Ingles H; Tattersall JE; Will EJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Jan; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 18697799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis].
    Petitclerc T; Coevoet B
    Nephrologie; 2001; 22(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 11572165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of prescribed and delivered doses of dialysis using anthropometrically and bioelectrically measured patient volumes.
    Załuska WT; Schneditz D; Swatowski A; Jaroszyński AJ; Ksiazek A
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Sep; 9(9):CR405-10. PubMed ID: 12960931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the hemodialysis dose.
    Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK
    Semin Dial; 2006; 19(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 16551284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Estimation of the dialysis time based on a simplified algorithm for urea kinetics].
    Pietrzyk JA
    Przegl Lek; 1992; 49(5):145-50. PubMed ID: 1438916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of standard and artificial neural network estimators of hemodialysis adequacy.
    Fernández EA; Valtuille R; Rodriguez Presedo J; Willshaw P
    Artif Organs; 2005 Feb; 29(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 15670285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring.
    Wuepper A; Tattersall J; Kraemer M; Wilkie M; Edwards L
    Kidney Int; 2003 Dec; 64(6):2262-71. PubMed ID: 14633151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The monitoring of dialysis dose by ionic dialysance-based Kt reveals less dialysis adequacy than the Kt/V(UREA)-based measurement in critically ill patients with acute renal failure].
    Serra Cabañas N; Barros Freiría X; Garro Martínez J; Blasco Pelícano M; Maduell Canals F; Torras Rabasa A; Poch López de Briñas E
    Nefrologia; 2010; 30(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 20393623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
    Maduell F; Puchades MJ; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Sánchez JJ
    Nefrologia; 2005; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bipedal bioelectrical impedance analysis reproducibly estimates total body water in hemodialysis patients.
    Kushner RF; Roxe DM
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Jan; 39(1):154-8. PubMed ID: 11774114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.