130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20628126)
1. Bias and trials stopped early for benefit.
Goodman S; Berry D; Wittes J
JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(2):157; author reply 158-9. PubMed ID: 20628126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias and trials stopped early for benefit.
Korn EL; Freidlin B; Mooney M
JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(2):157-8; author reply 158-9. PubMed ID: 20628125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias and trials stopped early for benefit.
Ellenberg SS; DeMets DL; Fleming TR
JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(2):158; author reply 158-9. PubMed ID: 20628127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias and trials stopped early for benefit.
Berry SM; Carlin BP; Connor J
JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(2):156; author reply 158-9. PubMed ID: 20628124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assuring that double-blind is blind.
Perlis RH; Ostacher M; Fava M; Nierenberg AA; Sachs GS; Rosenbaum JF
Am J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 167(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 20194487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased view.
Goodman SN
Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 19342465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpreting data from randomized trials: the Scandinavian prostatectomy study illustrates two common errors.
Vickers A
Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):404-5. PubMed ID: 16474658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical principles: myths or facts?
Sylvester R
Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 14709923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible?
Punt CJ
Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of clinical data with breached blindness.
Chow SC; Shao J
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1185-93. PubMed ID: 15083477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized trials or population-based registries.
Bergqvist D; Björck M; Säwe J; Troëng T
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 17689818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
Chan KC
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The analysis of binary and categorical data from crossover trials.
Kenward MG; Jones B
Stat Methods Med Res; 1994 Dec; 3(4):325-44. PubMed ID: 7889226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges of cluster randomized trials.
Campbell MJ
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 24969154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is it time to use observational data to estimate treatment effectiveness in multiple sclerosis?
Trojano M
Neurology; 2007 Oct; 69(15):1478-9. PubMed ID: 17923610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint testing of mortality and a non-fatal outcome in clinical trials.
McMahon RP; Harrell FE
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11304733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remarks on the method of propensity score.
Pearl J
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1415-6; author reply 1420-3. PubMed ID: 19340847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
Atkins DC
Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimizing bias in randomized trials: the importance of blinding.
Psaty BM; Prentice RL
JAMA; 2010 Aug; 304(7):793-4. PubMed ID: 20716744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
