383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20628303)
1. Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners.
Nakamura K; Gordon-Salant S
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 20628303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
Stuart A; Zhang J; Swink S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners.
Tabri D; Abou Chacra KM; Pring T
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(4):411-22. PubMed ID: 21771217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masking Release for Igbo and English.
Ebem DU; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Uguru JO
Afr J Comput Ict; 2013 Sep; 6(3):119-126. PubMed ID: 25343019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners.
von Hapsburg D; Champlin CA; Shetty SR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15030104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults and Children Who Speak English or Chinese as Their First Language.
Schafer EC; Aoyama K; Ho T; Castillo P; Conlin J; Jones J; Thompson S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):885-897. PubMed ID: 30479261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Kerber S; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
Wong LL; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 15937409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
Meemann K; Smiljanić R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
