These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20628599)

  • 21. Pinpointing transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data with SeqSite.
    Wang X; Zhang X
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011; 5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3. PubMed ID: 22784574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Ma W; Wong WH
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 497():51-73. PubMed ID: 21601082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shape-based peak identification for ChIP-Seq.
    Hower V; Evans SN; Pachter L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():15. PubMed ID: 21226895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peak-Finding Algorithms.
    Hung JH; Weng Z
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2017 Mar; 2017(3):. PubMed ID: 27574196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combining multiple ChIP-seq peak detection systems using combinatorial fusion.
    Schweikert C; Brown S; Tang Z; Smith PR; Hsu DF
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S12. PubMed ID: 23282014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Vivo ChIP-Seq of Nuclear Receptors: A Rough Guide to Transform Frozen Tissues into High-Confidence Genome-Wide Binding Profiles.
    Mir AA; Dyar KA; Greulich F; Quagliarini F; Jouffe C; Hubert MJ; Hemmer MC; Uhlenhaut NH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1966():39-70. PubMed ID: 31041738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PeakRanger: a cloud-enabled peak caller for ChIP-seq data.
    Feng X; Grossman R; Stein L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():139. PubMed ID: 21554709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the detection and refinement of transcription factor binding sites using ChIP-Seq data.
    Hu M; Yu J; Taylor JM; Chinnaiyan AM; Qin ZS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Apr; 38(7):2154-67. PubMed ID: 20056654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.
    Zhang S; Liang Y; Wang X; Su Z; Chen Y
    DNA Res; 2019 Jun; 26(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 30957858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ChIPseqR: analysis of ChIP-seq experiments.
    Humburg P; Helliwell CA; Bulger D; Stone G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():39. PubMed ID: 21281468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.
    Nix DA; Courdy SJ; Boucher KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():523. PubMed ID: 19061503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. HPeak: an HMM-based algorithm for defining read-enriched regions in ChIP-Seq data.
    Qin ZS; Yu J; Shen J; Maher CA; Hu M; Kalyana-Sundaram S; Yu J; Chinnaiyan AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jul; 11():369. PubMed ID: 20598134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates.
    Newell R; Pienaar R; Balderson B; Piper M; Essebier A; Bodén M
    Genomics; 2021 Jul; 113(4):1855-1866. PubMed ID: 33878366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative Comparison of Multiple Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-Sequencing (ChIP-seq) Experiments with spikChIP.
    Blanco E; Ballaré C; Di Croce L; Aranda S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2624():55-72. PubMed ID: 36723809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discovering transcription factor binding sites in highly repetitive regions of genomes with multi-read analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Chung D; Kuan PF; Li B; Sanalkumar R; Liang K; Bresnick EH; Dewey C; Keleş S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002111. PubMed ID: 21779159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extracting transcription factor targets from ChIP-Seq data.
    Tuteja G; White P; Schug J; Kaestner KH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Sep; 37(17):e113. PubMed ID: 19553195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of peak callers used for DNase-Seq data.
    Koohy H; Down TA; Spivakov M; Hubbard T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96303. PubMed ID: 24810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel ChIP-seq simulating program with superior versatility: isChIP.
    Subkhankulova T; Naumenko F; Tolmachov OE; Orlov YL
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33320934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology.
    Park PJ
    Nat Rev Genet; 2009 Oct; 10(10):669-80. PubMed ID: 19736561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimization of transcription factor binding map accuracy utilizing knockout-mouse models.
    Krebs W; Schmidt SV; Goren A; De Nardo D; Labzin L; Bovier A; Ulas T; Theis H; Kraut M; Latz E; Beyer M; Schultze JL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Dec; 42(21):13051-60. PubMed ID: 25378309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.