These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20629422)
1. [Magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in bone metastasis detection: a comparative study]. Lucić S; Nikoletić K; Peter A; Lucić MA; Jovanović D Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Jun; 67(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 20629422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the detection of vertebral metastasis? Chiewvit P; Danchaivijitr N; Sirivitmaitrie K; Chiewvit S; Thephamongkhol K J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):818-29. PubMed ID: 19530588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI? Kosuda S; Kaji T; Yokoyama H; Yokokawa T; Katayama M; Iriye T; Uematsu M; Kusano S J Nucl Med; 1996 Jun; 37(6):975-8. PubMed ID: 8683325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy]. Ketelsen D; Röthke M; Aschoff P; Merseburger AS; Lichy MP; Reimold M; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP Rofo; 2008 Aug; 180(8):746-52. PubMed ID: 18512192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Value of Technetium-99m Bone Scintigraphy in the Detection of Cervical Spine Metastases in Oncological Patients. Park SM; Park JW; Lee HJ; Choi JY; Yoo HJ; Lee CK; Chang BS; Kim H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Nov; 42(22):1699-1705. PubMed ID: 28368988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing visualization of vertebral metastases on MR imaging versus bone scintigraphy. Taoka T; Mayr NA; Lee HJ; Yuh WT; Simonson TM; Rezai K; Berbaum KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1525-30. PubMed ID: 11373226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and experimental imaging of breast cancer metastases in the spine. Petrén-Mallmin M Acta Radiol Suppl; 1994; 391():1-23. PubMed ID: 8172006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential diagnostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography with Tc-99m-methylene diphosphonate in patients with spinal lesions. Zhang Y; Shi H; Gu Y; Xiu Y; Li B; Zhu W; Chen S; Yu H Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Dec; 32(12):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21934544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic problems of evaluating vertebral metastasis from breast carcinoma with a higher degree of malignancy. Nishimura R; Nagao K; Miyayama H; Yasunaga T; Asao C; Matsuda M; Baba K; Matsuoka Y; Yamashita H; Fukuda M Cancer; 1999 Apr; 85(8):1782-8. PubMed ID: 10223573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of spinal bone marrow infiltration in untreated patients with multiple myeloma. Hur J; Yoon CS; Ryu YH; Yun MJ; Suh JS Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 18415787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of single photon emission computed tomography imaging in the detection of lumbar vertebral metastases from prostate cancer. Nozaki T; Yasuda K; Akashi T; Fuse H Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):516-9. PubMed ID: 18422581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [MRI in the early diagnosis of spinal metastases of bronchial cancer]. Sauvage PJ; Thivolle P; Noël JB; Dagognet J; Quipourt V; Auberger R; Maréchal F; Robert J J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8830142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Algra PR; Bloem JL; Tissing H; Falke TH; Arndt JW; Verboom LJ Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 2028061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/low-dose computerized tomography did not increase sensitivity or specificity compared to planar bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer. Haraldsen A; Bluhme H; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Jensen AB; Hansen EB; Nellemann H; Rasmussen F; Morsing A Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Jan; 36(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25257661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metastases seen on SPECT imaging despite a normal planar bone scan. Roland J; van den Weyngaert D; Krug B; Brans B; Scalliet P; Vandevivere J Clin Nucl Med; 1995 Dec; 20(12):1052-4. PubMed ID: 8674288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Feasibility and clinical value of whole body diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in detection of bone metastases]. Li S; Xue HD; Sun F; Jin ZY Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 19507599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative detectability of bone metastases and impact on therapy of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in patients with breast cancer. Altehoefer C; Ghanem N; Högerle S; Moser E; Langer M Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 11673003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bone single-photon emission tomography and planar imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases in patients with back pain. Han LJ; Au-Yong TK; Tong WC; Chu KS; Szeto LT; Wong CP Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Jun; 25(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 9618579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging findings and clinical features of patients with multiple myeloma with the prognostic effect of bone marrow focal and diffuse infiltration patterns on spine MRI. Aribas BK; Arda K; Yologlu Z; Ciledag N; Aktas E; Ozdemir S; Dogan K; Fen T; Dagli M Minerva Med; 2011 Apr; 102(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 21483398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]