BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2062978)

  • 1. Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: a quantitative review of comparative research.
    Nicholson RA; Kugler KE
    Psychol Bull; 1991 May; 109(3):355-370. PubMed ID: 2062978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.
    Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie R; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Feucht-Haviar T; Oberlander L
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].
    Tron P; Loas G
    Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1992 Dec; 150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6. PubMed ID: 1343504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of an innovative music therapy treatment method: trial competency through music.
    Sammons A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 25187289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homeless mentally disordered defendants: competency to stand trial and mental status findings.
    Martell DA; Rosner R; Harmon RB
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 7949417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competency restoration treatment: differences between defendants declared competent or incompetent to stand trial.
    Advokat CD; Guidry D; Burnett DM; Manguno-Mire G; Thompson JW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 22396346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ["Serious crimes during treatment in legal psychiatric commitment (section 63 StGB)."Comment on the contribution by R. Freese et a].
    Leygraf N
    Nervenarzt; 1997 May; 68(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 9280856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability, validity and utility of the Fitness Interview Test.
    McDonald DA; Nussbaum DS; Bagby RM
    Can J Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 36(7):480-4. PubMed ID: 1933756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Garry David case.
    Bartholomew AA
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Mar; 26(1):134-5. PubMed ID: 1580881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment planning for the patient who is incompetent to stand trial.
    Davis DL
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 3979977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.
    Litwack TR
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):135-56. PubMed ID: 12645042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the psychiatrist in dangerous offender hearings.
    Coles EM; Grant FE
    Can J Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 36(7):534-43. PubMed ID: 1933766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personality disorders and 'restoration to sanity'.
    Osran HC; Weinberger LE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 7949414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The mental disability requirement in the insanity defense.
    Slovenko R
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 10398328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudopsychopathic schizophrenia--a neglected diagnostic entity with legal implications.
    Durst R; Jabotinsky-Rubin K; Fliman M
    Med Law; 1997; 16(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 9409132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impossible dialogue between psychiatry and the judicial system: a language problem.
    Zemishlany Z; Melamed Y
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(3):150-4; discussion 155-8. PubMed ID: 17294980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of competency to stand trial in mental health courts.
    Stafford KP; Wygant DB
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 15818634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
    Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.