155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2062978)
21. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of civil patients and incompetent defendants: pre and post deinstitutionalization.
Arvanites TM
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 2289029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evolving systems of care: Individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in custody of civil and forensic psychiatric services.
Crocker AG; Côté G
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 24(6):356-64. PubMed ID: 19720502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
Morris DR; Parker GF
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Criminal defendants who desire punishment.
Appelbaum KL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 2289028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative study of forensic psychiatric system between China and America.
Li G; Gutheil TG; Hu Z
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():164-70. PubMed ID: 27292971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The prosecution of violent psychiatric inpatients: one respectable intervention.
Rachlin S
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 7949412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multiple personality disorder in criminal law.
Steinberg M; Bancroft J; Buchanan J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):345-56. PubMed ID: 8148515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors associated with the diversion of mentally disordered offenders.
Davis S
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 7841510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combined evaluations of competency to stand trial and mental state at the time of the offense: An overlooked methodological consideration?
Kois L; Wellbeloved-Stone JM; Chauhan P; Warren JI
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):217-229. PubMed ID: 28182458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of competency to stand trial: contribution of demographics, type of offense, clinical characteristics, and psycholegal ability.
Nicholson RA; Johnson WG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1864694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Dangerousness prognosis in the clinical context of fulfillment of psychiatric criminal commitment].
Weber F; Koch U; Leygraf N
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1996 Aug; 46(8):312-7. PubMed ID: 8927687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intoxication and settled insanity: a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity.
Feix J; Wolber G
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17592162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors that predict murder defendants' competence to stand trial.
Tartaro C; Duntley J; Medvetz S; Hafner N
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 59():31-37. PubMed ID: 29996985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. ['Commitment-adequate' personality diagnosis using the Seitz (revised) Personality Questionnaire for Prisoners within the scope of forensic-psychologic-psychiatric expert assessment].
Littmann E
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1989 May; 41(5):280-7. PubMed ID: 2762426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
Mossman D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Criminal acts leading to commitment according to psychiatric jurisprudence].
Jöckel D; Müller-Isberner R
Nervenarzt; 1997 May; 68(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 9280848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting treatment outcome for incompetent defendants.
Nicholson RA; Barnard GW; Robbins L; Hankins G
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 7841508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]