These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20629960)
1. Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Kloke WB Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 20629960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses. Jaschinski W; Svede A; Jainta S Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 18164741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in children and adults. Jaschinski W; König M Strabismus; 2006 Jun; 14(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 16760113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation between static and dynamic aspects of vergence, estimated with a subjective test using flashed dichoptic nonius lines. Jaschinski W Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):399-410. PubMed ID: 15315654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses. Jainta S; Hoormann J; Jaschinski W Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3238-46. PubMed ID: 17959213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions]. Gerling J; Ball M; Bömer T; Bach M; Kommerell G Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9644669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence. Jaschinski W PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199958. PubMed ID: 29980146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influences of monocular image degradation on the monocular components of fixation disparity. Irving EL; Robertson KM Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Jul; 16(4):326-35. PubMed ID: 8796202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of nonius line and fusion lock parameters on fixation disparity. Ukwade MT Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 77(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 10879788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in school children with reading-spelling disorders]. Jaschinski W; König M; Schmidt R; Methling D Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Oct; 221(10):854-61. PubMed ID: 15499521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception. Masson GS; Busettini C; Miles FA Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):283-6. PubMed ID: 9305842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring fixation disparity with infrared eye-trackers. De Luca M; Spinelli D; Zoccolotti P; Zeri F J Biomed Opt; 2009; 14(1):014013. PubMed ID: 19256701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fixation disparity and accommodation as a function of viewing distance and prism load. Jaschinski W Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jul; 17(4):324-39. PubMed ID: 9390377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism. Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dark vergence in relation to fixation disparity at different luminance and blur levels. Jaschinski-Kruza W Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(9):1197-204. PubMed ID: 8184563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]