170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20629997)
1. 'Nothing is really safe': a focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes.
Haddow G; Bruce A; Sathanandam S; Wyatt JC
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1140-6. PubMed ID: 20629997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.
King T; Brankovic L; Gillard P
Int J Med Inform; 2012 Apr; 81(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 22306206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of electronic patient records for research: views of patients and staff in general practice.
Stevenson F; Lloyd N; Harrington L; Wallace P
Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23132893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.
Robling MR; Hood K; Houston H; Pill R; Fay J; Evans HM
J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 14872086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.
Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use and Understanding of Anonymization and De-Identification in the Biomedical Literature: Scoping Review.
Chevrier R; Foufi V; Gaudet-Blavignac C; Robert A; Lovis C
J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13484. PubMed ID: 31152528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study.
Hill EM; Turner EL; Martin RM; Donovan JL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():72. PubMed ID: 23734773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptions and Attitudes towards Medical Research in the United Arab Emirates: Results from the Abu Dhabi Cohort Study (ADCS) Focus Group Discussions.
El Obaid Y; Al Hamiz A; Abdulle A; Hayes RB; Sherman S; Ali R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149609. PubMed ID: 26943636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning from experience: privacy and the secondary use of data in health research.
Lowrance WW
J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(4):30-60. PubMed ID: 15072055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size matters: how population size influences genotype-phenotype association studies in anonymized data.
Heatherly R; Denny JC; Haines JL; Roden DM; Malin BA
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():243-50. PubMed ID: 25038554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public?
Willison DJ; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Swinton M; Northrup D; Thabane L
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 17712084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using anonymized NHS data without consent: a step too far?
McHale JV
Br J Nurs; 2012 Jan 12-25; 21(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 22240524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New Zealanders' attitudes towards access to their electronic health records: preliminary results from a national study using vignettes.
Hunter IM; Whiddett RJ; Norris AC; McDonald BW; Waldon JA
Health Informatics J; 2009 Sep; 15(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 19713396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews.
Asai A; Ohnishi M; Nishigaki E; Sekimoto M; Fukuhara S; Fukui T
BMC Med Ethics; 2002 Jan; 3():E1. PubMed ID: 11825345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
Aitken M; de St Jorre J; Pagliari C; Jepson R; Cunningham-Burley S
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 27832780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial.
Harle CA; Golembiewski EH; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Mainous AG; Moseley RE
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Jul; 26(7):620-629. PubMed ID: 30938751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Citizens and personal health records - the case of Nelson Mandela Bay.
Pottas D; Mostert-Phipps N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():501-4. PubMed ID: 23920605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disambiguation data: extracting information from anonymized sources.
Dreiseitl S; Vinterbo S; Ohno-Machado L
Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():144-8. PubMed ID: 11825171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
