These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20629997)
1. 'Nothing is really safe': a focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes. Haddow G; Bruce A; Sathanandam S; Wyatt JC J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1140-6. PubMed ID: 20629997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study. Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. King T; Brankovic L; Gillard P Int J Med Inform; 2012 Apr; 81(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 22306206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of electronic patient records for research: views of patients and staff in general practice. Stevenson F; Lloyd N; Harrington L; Wallace P Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23132893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. Robling MR; Hood K; Houston H; Pill R; Fay J; Evans HM J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 14872086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study. Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK. Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use and Understanding of Anonymization and De-Identification in the Biomedical Literature: Scoping Review. Chevrier R; Foufi V; Gaudet-Blavignac C; Robert A; Lovis C J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13484. PubMed ID: 31152528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. Hill EM; Turner EL; Martin RM; Donovan JL BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():72. PubMed ID: 23734773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptions and Attitudes towards Medical Research in the United Arab Emirates: Results from the Abu Dhabi Cohort Study (ADCS) Focus Group Discussions. El Obaid Y; Al Hamiz A; Abdulle A; Hayes RB; Sherman S; Ali R PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149609. PubMed ID: 26943636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning from experience: privacy and the secondary use of data in health research. Lowrance WW J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(4):30-60. PubMed ID: 15072055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size matters: how population size influences genotype-phenotype association studies in anonymized data. Heatherly R; Denny JC; Haines JL; Roden DM; Malin BA J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():243-50. PubMed ID: 25038554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public? Willison DJ; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Swinton M; Northrup D; Thabane L J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 17712084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using anonymized NHS data without consent: a step too far? McHale JV Br J Nurs; 2012 Jan 12-25; 21(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 22240524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New Zealanders' attitudes towards access to their electronic health records: preliminary results from a national study using vignettes. Hunter IM; Whiddett RJ; Norris AC; McDonald BW; Waldon JA Health Informatics J; 2009 Sep; 15(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 19713396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews. Asai A; Ohnishi M; Nishigaki E; Sekimoto M; Fukuhara S; Fukui T BMC Med Ethics; 2002 Jan; 3():E1. PubMed ID: 11825345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Aitken M; de St Jorre J; Pagliari C; Jepson R; Cunningham-Burley S BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 27832780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. Harle CA; Golembiewski EH; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Mainous AG; Moseley RE J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Jul; 26(7):620-629. PubMed ID: 30938751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Citizens and personal health records - the case of Nelson Mandela Bay. Pottas D; Mostert-Phipps N Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():501-4. PubMed ID: 23920605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disambiguation data: extracting information from anonymized sources. Dreiseitl S; Vinterbo S; Ohno-Machado L Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():144-8. PubMed ID: 11825171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]