These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20630329)

  • 1. Choosing appropriate comparators.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):811-2. PubMed ID: 20630329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CONSORT and QUOROM statements revisited: standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery.
    Knobloch K; Gohritz A; Vogt PM
    Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1106-7; discussion 1107-8. PubMed ID: 19092359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing treatment effects in the "real world".
    Jones AS; Shinogle JA
    Clin Ther; 2010 Oct; 32(11):1952-3. PubMed ID: 21095489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trials in surgery: comic opera no more?
    Kassell NF; Dumont AS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):243-4. PubMed ID: 16872942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting of randomized clinical trials and other population-based research: a priority of Archives of Neurology.
    Shoulson I; Rosenberg RN
    Arch Neurol; 2004 Jan; 61(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 14732613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery.
    Carney S
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):376. PubMed ID: 18063433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized clinical trials in surgery: why do we need them?
    Balch CM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):241-2. PubMed ID: 16872941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative-effectiveness research in cataract and refractive surgery: the CATT call.
    Dupps WJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1569-70. PubMed ID: 21855755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
    Guise JM; Viswanathan M
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality of methodology and reporting of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity].
    Liu XM; Zhang MM; Du L
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 26(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 15171560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hoping for a TREND toward PRISMA: the variety and value of research reporting guidelines.
    Kearney MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2014 Apr; 37(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 24619627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning.
    Johnson ML; Chitnis AS
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Feb; 11(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21351858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the quality of clinical trials in surgery.
    Piantadosi S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 16872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology: an overview.
    Lyman GH; Levine M
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4181-4. PubMed ID: 23071249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Toward a comparative effectiveness policy in Italy].
    Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 21628748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.
    Scott I; Greenberg P; Poole P; Campbell D
    Intern Med J; 2006 Sep; 36(9):587-99. PubMed ID: 16911551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology for comparative effectiveness research: potential and limitations.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4185-7. PubMed ID: 23071226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reports of clinical trials: ethical aspects.
    Sade RM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 16872943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.