These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20630931)
1. Identifying quality improvement intervention evaluations: is consensus achievable? Danz MS; Rubenstein LV; Hempel S; Foy R; Suttorp M; Farmer MM; Shekelle PG Qual Saf Health Care; 2010 Aug; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 20630931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications. Rubenstein LV; Hempel S; Farmer MM; Asch SM; Yano EM; Dougherty D; Shekelle PW Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Dec; 17(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 19064654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment. Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance? Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of a nonrandomized stepped wedge design to evaluate an evidence-based quality improvement intervention: a proof of concept using simulated data on patient-centered medical homes. Huynh AK; Lee ML; Farmer MM; Rubenstein LV BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 27769177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up. Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications. Tseng TY; Breau RH; Fesperman SF; Vieweg J; Dahm P BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19021602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Have we progressed in the surgical literature? Thirty-year trends in clinical studies in 3 surgical journals. Shawhan RR; Hatch QM; Bingham JR; Nelson DW; Fitzpatrick EB; McLeod R; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Steele SR Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25489703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Brender J; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M Int J Med Inform; 2009 Jan; 78(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18930696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record. Zegers M; de Bruijne MC; Wagner C; Groenewegen PP; van der Wal G; de Vet HC J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 19473812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Anales Españoles de Pediatría 2001. Bibliometric indicators of scientific quality]. González de Dios J An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Aug; 57(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 12139870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Redundant publications in scientific ophthalmologic journals: the tip of the iceberg? Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):863-6. PubMed ID: 15121360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]