These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20631320)

  • 1. Independent sampling of features enables conscious perception of bound objects.
    Vul E; Rich AN
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1168-75. PubMed ID: 20631320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object-based selection from spatially-invariant representations: evidence from a feature-report task.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):447-57. PubMed ID: 21264725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features.
    Melcher D; Papathomas TV; Vidnyánszky Z
    Neuron; 2005 Jun; 46(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 15924859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Object-based attention: shifting or uncertainty?
    Drummond L; Shomstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1743-55. PubMed ID: 20952774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staying within the lines: the formation of visuospatial boundaries influences multisensory feature integration.
    Fiebelkorn IC; Foxe JJ; Schwartz TH; Molholm S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1737-43. PubMed ID: 20584177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective influences of cross-modal spatial-cues on preattentive auditory processing: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Mathiak K; Hertrich I; Zvyagintsev M; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 16054843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial attention effects during conscious and nonconscious processing of visual features and objects.
    Tapia E; Breitmeyer BG; Jacob J; Broyles EC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):745-56. PubMed ID: 23046142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual saliency and spike timing in the ventral visual pathway.
    VanRullen R
    J Physiol Paris; 2003; 97(2-3):365-77. PubMed ID: 14766152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object-based warping: an illusory distortion of space within objects.
    Vickery TJ; Chun MM
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1759-64. PubMed ID: 21068342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human brain activity associated with audiovisual perception and attention.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Pekkola J; Autti T; Jääskeläinen IP; Sams M; Alho K
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(4):1683-91. PubMed ID: 17204433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.