211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20632050)
1. Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Taubert J; Parr LA
Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 20632050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Taubert J; Qureshi AA; Parr LA
J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 22390621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Parr LA; Winslow JT; Hopkins WD; de Waal FB
J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 10739311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual kin recognition in nonhuman primates: (Pan troglodytes and Macaca mulatta): inbreeding avoidance or male distinctiveness?
Parr LA; Heintz M; Lonsdorf E; Wroblewski E
J Comp Psychol; 2010 Nov; 124(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 21090888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
Parr LA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 21784381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
Parr LA; Taubert J
Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):1964-72. PubMed ID: 21123266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
Weldon KB; Taubert J; Smith CL; Parr LA
Anim Cogn; 2013 Sep; 16(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 23420511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust representations of individual faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Taubert J; Weldon KB; Parr LA
Anim Cogn; 2017 Mar; 20(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 27864643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.
Parr LA; Taubert J; Little AC; Hancock PJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2411-34. PubMed ID: 22670823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Hopkins WD; Washburn DA
Anim Cogn; 2002 Mar; 5(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11957399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of familiarity and viewpoint on face recognition in chimpanzees.
Parr LA; Siebert E; Taubert J
Perception; 2011; 40(7):863-72. PubMed ID: 22128558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.
Parr LA; Heintz M; Pradhan G
J Comp Psychol; 2008 Nov; 122(4):390-402. PubMed ID: 19014263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Hopkins WD; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
Behav Neurosci; 1990 Aug; 104(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 2206427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What meaning means for same and different: Analogical reasoning in humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Flemming TM; Beran MJ; Thompson RK; Kleider HM; Washburn DA
J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 18489233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.
Taubert J; Aagten-Murphy D; Parr LA
Perception; 2012; 41(4):460-73. PubMed ID: 22896918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seeing two faces together: preference formation in humans and rhesus macaques.
Méary D; Li Z; Li W; Guo K; Pascalis O
Anim Cogn; 2014 Sep; 17(5):1107-19. PubMed ID: 24638876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The face inversion effect in non-human primates revisited - an investigation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Dahl CD; Rasch MJ; Tomonaga M; Adachi I
Sci Rep; 2013; 3():2504. PubMed ID: 23978930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition.
Gothard KM; Brooks KN; Peterson MA
Anim Cogn; 2009 Jan; 12(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 18787848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the face inversion effect in nonhuman primates: a phylogenetic meta-analysis.
Griffin JW
Anim Cogn; 2020 Mar; 23(2):237-249. PubMed ID: 31872303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
