BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20632572)

  • 1. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
    Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of effective decision criteria for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.
    Holdsworth C; Stewart RD; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2964-74. PubMed ID: 21815370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning.
    Fiege J; McCurdy B; Potrebko P; Champion H; Cull A
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5217-29. PubMed ID: 21978066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tomotherapy-like versus VMAT-like treatments: a multicriteria comparison for a prostate geometry.
    Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7418-29. PubMed ID: 23231292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
    Sayre GA; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approximating convex pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning.
    Craft DL; Halabi TF; Shih HA; Bortfeld TR
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3399-407. PubMed ID: 17022236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A hierarchical evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.
    Holdsworth C; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4986-97. PubMed ID: 20964218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy.
    Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3292-303. PubMed ID: 19673225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques.
    Ottosson RO; Engstrom PE; Sjöström D; Behrens CF; Karlsson A; Knöös T; Ceberg C
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 18752085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiobjective inverse planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy with constraint-free gradient-based optimization algorithms.
    Lahanas M; Schreibmann E; Baltas D
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2843-71. PubMed ID: 14516105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personalized treatment planning with a model of radiation therapy outcomes for use in multiobjective optimization of IMRT plans for prostate cancer.
    Smith WP; Kim M; Holdsworth C; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():38. PubMed ID: 26968687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer using Pareto fronts.
    Wüthrich D; Wang Z; Zeverino M; Bourhis J; Bochud F; Moeckli R
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):3010-3019. PubMed ID: 38055371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method to dynamically balance intensity modulated radiotherapy dose between organs-at-risk.
    Das SK
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1744-52. PubMed ID: 19544792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to increase flexibility in the search for better IMRT plans.
    Holdsworth C; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2261-74. PubMed ID: 22482647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
    Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Kamal Sayed H; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2049-2060. PubMed ID: 32077497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of optimisation parameters on directly deliverable Pareto fronts explored for prostate cancer.
    Wüthrich D; Zeverino M; Bourhis J; Bochud F; Moeckli R
    Phys Med; 2023 Oct; 114():103139. PubMed ID: 37757500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
    Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.