300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20632574)
1. Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: comparison of detection and estimation task performance.
Richard S; Samei E
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2627-37. PubMed ID: 20632574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative breast tomosynthesis: from detectability to estimability.
Richard S; Samei E
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6157-65. PubMed ID: 21302772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative image-based spectral reconstruction for computed tomography.
Heismann B; Balda M
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4471-85. PubMed ID: 19928078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT.
Nosratieh A; Yang K; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7254-61. PubMed ID: 23231276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system.
Chawla AS; Samei E; Saunders RS; Lo JY; Baker JA
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1337-45. PubMed ID: 18491528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Balancing dose and image registration accuracy for cone beam tomosynthesis (CBTS) for breast patient setup.
Winey BA; Zygmanski P; Cormack RA; Lyatskaya Y
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4414-23. PubMed ID: 20879600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Task-driven image acquisition and reconstruction in cone-beam CT.
Gang GJ; Stayman JW; Ehtiati T; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3129-50. PubMed ID: 25803361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT.
Gang GJ; Tward DJ; Lee J; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):1948-65. PubMed ID: 20527529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
