72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20633762)
1. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed four genomic prognostic biomarkers for primary gastric cancers.
Tomioka N; Morita K; Kobayashi N; Tada M; Itoh T; Saitoh S; Kondo M; Takahashi N; Kataoka A; Nakanishi K; Takahashi M; Kamiyama T; Ozaki M; Hirano T; Todo S
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Aug; 201(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20633762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bladder cancer stage and outcome by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Blaveri E; Brewer JL; Roydasgupta R; Fridlyand J; DeVries S; Koppie T; Pejavar S; Mehta K; Carroll P; Simko JP; Waldman FM
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Oct; 11(19 Pt 1):7012-22. PubMed ID: 16203795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between genomic alterations assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization, prognostically informative histologic subtype, stage, and patient survival in gastric cancer.
Rossi E; Klersy C; Manca R; Zuffardi O; Solcia E
Hum Pathol; 2011 Dec; 42(12):1937-45. PubMed ID: 21676433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA copy number aberrations associated with the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers: Identification of genomic biomarkers by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Nakao M; Kawauchi S; Uchiyama T; Adachi J; Ito H; Chochi Y; Furuya T; Oga A; Sasaki K
Oncol Rep; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1603-11. PubMed ID: 21468551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of gains on 1q and epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression as independent prognostic markers in intracranial ependymoma.
Mendrzyk F; Korshunov A; Benner A; Toedt G; Pfister S; Radlwimmer B; Lichter P
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):2070-9. PubMed ID: 16609018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gastric cancers in young and elderly patients show different genomic profiles.
Buffart TE; Carvalho B; Hopmans E; Brehm V; Kranenbarg EK; Schaaij-Visser TB; Eijk PP; van Grieken NC; Ylstra B; van de Velde CJ; Meijer GA
J Pathol; 2007 Jan; 211(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17117405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrent genomic alterations with impact on survival in colorectal cancer identified by genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization.
Kim MY; Yim SH; Kwon MS; Kim TM; Shin SH; Kang HM; Lee C; Chung YJ
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1913-24. PubMed ID: 17087931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of mutator phenotype and chromosome 17p and 18q allelic loss in gastric cancer.
de Manzoni G; Tomezzoli A; Di Leo A; Moore PS; Talamini G; Scarpa A
Br J Surg; 2001 Mar; 88(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 11260110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of amplicon boundaries at 20q13.2 in tissue samples of human gastric adenocarcinomas by high-resolution microarray comparative genomic hybridization.
Weiss MM; Snijders AM; Kuipers EJ; Ylstra B; Pinkel D; Meuwissen SG; van Diest PJ; Albertson DG; Meijer GA
J Pathol; 2003 Jul; 200(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 12845628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of bacterial artificial chromosome array-based comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping to the analysis of glioblastoma multiforme.
Cowell JK; Matsui S; Wang YD; LaDuca J; Conroy J; McQuaid D; Nowak NJ
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 May; 151(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 15120909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers.
Chin SF; Wang Y; Thorne NP; Teschendorff AE; Pinder SE; Vias M; Naderi A; Roberts I; Barbosa-Morais NL; Garcia MJ; Iyer NG; Kranjac T; Robertson JF; Aparicio S; Tavaré S; Ellis I; Brenton JD; Caldas C
Oncogene; 2007 Mar; 26(13):1959-70. PubMed ID: 17001317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gene copy number change events at chromosome 20 and their association with recurrence in gastric cancer patients.
Yang SH; Seo MY; Jeong HJ; Jeung HC; Shin J; Kim SC; Noh SH; Chung HC; Rha SY
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Jan; 11(2 Pt 1):612-20. PubMed ID: 15701848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distal chromosome 17 gains in neuroblastomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) are associated with a poor clinical outcome.
Brinkschmidt C; Christiansen H; Terpe HJ; Simon R; Lampert F; Boecker W; Dockhorn-Dworniczak B
Med Pediatr Oncol; 2001 Jan; 36(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11464859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cytogenetically characterized, genome-anchored 10-Mb BAC set and CGH array for the domestic dog.
Thomas R; Duke SE; Bloom SK; Breen TE; Young AC; Feiste E; Seiser EL; Tsai PC; Langford CF; Ellis P; Karlsson EK; Lindblad-Toh K; Breen M
J Hered; 2007; 98(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 17702974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gain at chromosomal region 5p15.33, containing TERT, is the most frequent genetic event in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer.
Kang JU; Koo SH; Kwon KC; Park JW; Kim JM
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Apr; 182(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18328944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Correlation with histoprognostic variables and c-erbB-2 immunoexpression.
Malamou-Mitsi VD; Syrrou M; Georgiou I; Pagoulatos G; Agnantis NJ
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 10606182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of comparative genomic hybridization and loss of heterozygosity in 43 primary gastric carcinomas.
Wang Q; Wang B; Guan X; Gao H; Cheng H; Zhang Q; Huang C; Li P; Fu S
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Apr; 116(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 12875714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gain of 5p15 detected by comparative genomic hybridization as an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Ueno T; Tangoku A; Yoshino S; Abe T; Toshimitsu H; Furuya T; Kawauchi S; Oga A; Oka M; Sasaki K
Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Feb; 8(2):526-33. PubMed ID: 11839673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of microsatellite marker, AP-PCR and CGH studies in primary renal cell carcinoma.
Hoefling C; Schmidt H; Meinhardt M; Lohse A; Taubert H; Fuessel S; Schmidt U; Schuster K; Baretton G; Wirth MP; Meye A
Int J Mol Med; 2004 Jun; 13(6):835-42. PubMed ID: 15138621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
