261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20634770)
1. The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: a study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array.
Kim JR; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Kim LS
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1041-8. PubMed ID: 20634770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Stille LJ
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108257. PubMed ID: 34020316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Recognition Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):344-358. PubMed ID: 28885234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 36253905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Jeng FC; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):918-934. PubMed ID: 31688319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Colesa DJ; Buswinka CJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107809. PubMed ID: 31630082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
Clay KM; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners.
Langner F; Arenberg JG; Büchner A; Nogueira W
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261295. PubMed ID: 34898654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.
Smoorenburg GF; Willeboer C; van Dijk JE
Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):335-47. PubMed ID: 12401965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance.
van Eijl RH; Buitenhuis PJ; Stegeman I; Klis SF; Grolman W
Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):476-487. PubMed ID: 27804133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of ECAP-based choice of stimulation rate on speech-perception performance.
Bournique JL; Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 23303197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
