115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20634771)
1. How internet telephony could improve communication for hearing-impaired individuals.
Mantokoudis G; Kompis M; Dubach P; Caversaccio M; Senn P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 20634771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals.
Mantokoudis G; Dubach P; Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Senn P
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):e102. PubMed ID: 22805169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of the actions taken by adults who failed a telephone-based hearing screen.
Meyer C; Hickson L; Khan A; Hartley D; Dillon H; Seymour J
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):720-31. PubMed ID: 21697715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Remote programming of cochlear implants: a telecommunications model.
McElveen JT; Blackburn EL; Green JD; McLear PW; Thimsen DJ; Wilson BS
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1035-40. PubMed ID: 20147864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the quality and applicability of the Dutch scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired using item response theory.
Mokkink LB; Knol DL; van Nispen RM; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):556-71. PubMed ID: 20530379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Telecommunication Modality, Internet Transmission Quality, and Accessories on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Mantokoudis G; Koller R; Guignard J; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Senn P
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Apr; 19(4):e135. PubMed ID: 28438727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?
Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Adunka MC; Buchman CA
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1049-54. PubMed ID: 20351607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PubMed ID: 1939883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids.
Cohen SM; Labadie RF; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Oct; 131(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 15467610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cochlear implants to deaf adults: psychosocial consequences].
Mortensen MV; Jochumsen U; Pedersen CB; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(34):2894-8. PubMed ID: 15449528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
Somers MN
Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():174-8. PubMed ID: 2069178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
