These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20635655)

  • 1. [Soft tissue changes of upper lip in patients with class I malocclusion with different premolar extraction patterns].
    Zhang SF; Lin XP; Zheng ML
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 28(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20635655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Soft tissue changes of chin with different premolar extraction patterns].
    Zhang SF; Lin XP; Zheng ML
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Oct; 18(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 19907851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Correlation analysis of the nasolabial angle of Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with vertical growth pattern after tooth extraction orthodontic treatment].
    Peng M; Kang J; Zhou J; Du B
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 33(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 26552244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions].
    Chen W; Chen RJ; Pan XG; Yu Q; Hu Z; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Aug; 19(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 20871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
    Tadic N; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases].
    Xu TM; Liu Y; Huang W; Lin JX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Dec; 36(6):650-4. PubMed ID: 15605103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.
    Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review.
    Janson G; Mendes LM; Junqueira CH; Garib DG
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):631-637. PubMed ID: 26620831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips.
    Wholley CJ; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 12940559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females.
    Kachiwala VA; Kalha AS; Machado G
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19634460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy.
    Scott Conley R; Jernigan C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16448270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.
    Omar Z; Short L; Banting DW; Saltaji H
    Int Orthod; 2018 Mar; 16(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 29478932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The soft tissue change of Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with vertical growth pattern after tooth extraction orthodontic treatment].
    Peng MH; Meng QJ; Wang LC
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 28(4):399-403, 407. PubMed ID: 20848934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical skeletal changes after extraction and non-extraction treatment in matched class I patients identified by a discriminant analysis: cephalometric appraisal and Procrustes superimposition.
    Beit P; Konstantonis D; Papagiannis A; Eliades T
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29250718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the soft tissue profile after extraction orthodontic therapy.
    Darendeliler N; Taner L
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 17367034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging software in predicting soft tissue changes of Class II Division 1 incisor relationship treated by all first premolar extraction compared with post-treatment lateral cephalogram.
    Maniyar N; Prakash AT; Kumar HCK; Yavagal PC
    J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):128-135. PubMed ID: 38503646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.
    Yashwant V A; K R; Arumugam E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 27653264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.