614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20636352)
1. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.
Schmitz Mda S; Santos R; Capelli A; Jacobovitz M; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18949299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy.
Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity.
Markvart M; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Dalstra M; Kreiborg S; Bjørndal L
Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 22044111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
