These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20636510)

  • 1. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards healthcare information technology.
    Huryk LA
    J Nurs Manag; 2010 Jul; 18(5):606-12. PubMed ID: 20636510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals.
    Alquraini H; Alhashem AM; Shah MA; Chowdhury RI
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Feb; 57(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17291201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital.
    Chow SK; Chin WY; Lee HY; Leung HC; Tang FH
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Jun; 21(11-12):1685-96. PubMed ID: 22081971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurses' perceptions of and attitudes toward an electronic medical record system at Seoul National University Hospital.
    Ahn TS; Park IS; You OS; Shin HJ; Woo KS; Jo EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():851. PubMed ID: 17102423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
    Dahm MF; Wadensten B
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Nursing personnel attitudes prior to the introduction of informatic tools and contemporary vision of a hospital information system].
    Vereecke PJ
    Rech Soins Infirm; 1996 Sep; (46):83-93. PubMed ID: 16737037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of nurse attitudes before implementation and 6 and 18 months after implementation of an electronic health record.
    Laramee AS; Bosek M; Shaner-McRae H; Powers-Phaneuf T
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Oct; 30(10):521-30. PubMed ID: 22584880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving information management in ward nurses' practice.
    Ballard EC
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Aug 23-29; 20(50):43-8. PubMed ID: 16964775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pretest and post-test attitudes of nursing personnel toward a patient care information system.
    Murphy CA; Maynard M; Morgan G
    Comput Nurs; 1994; 12(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 7954068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: early stage of technology implementation.
    Lee TT
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2007; 25(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 17827993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of wireless personal digital assistants for practice: perceptions of advanced practice nurses.
    Garrett B; Klein G
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2146-54. PubMed ID: 18705736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey says: care, communication enhanced by IT. Nurses report ups and downs of current systems.
    Sensmeier J
    Nurs Manage; 2006 Oct; Suppl():2, 4, 6 passim. PubMed ID: 17016162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploration of nurses' information environment.
    Ballard EC
    Nurse Res; 2006; 13(4):50-65. PubMed ID: 16897940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerization and its contribution to care quality improvement: the nurses' perspective.
    Kagan I; Fish M; Farkash-Fink N; Barnoy S
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):881-8. PubMed ID: 25176353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry.
    Tung FC; Chang SC; Chou CM
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 May; 77(5):324-35. PubMed ID: 17644029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of a VIPS implementation programme on nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards documentation.
    Darmer MR; Ankersen L; Nielsen BG; Landberger G; Lippert E; Egerod I
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2004 Sep; 18(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 15355528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nursing satisfaction and attitudes with computerized software implementation: a quasi-experimental study.
    Smith D; Morris A; Janke J
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Apr; 29(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21048497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service.
    Sequist TD; Cullen T; Hays H; Taualii MM; Simon SR; Bates DW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 17213495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To DeZarn's commentary on Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information.
    Darbyshire P
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Aug; 15(8):1060-1. PubMed ID: 16879551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A literature review: factors that impact on nurses' effective use of the Medical Emergency Team (MET).
    Jones L; King L; Wilson C
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Dec; 18(24):3379-90. PubMed ID: 20487489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.