These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2063670)

  • 21. Brain stem evoked responses by intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Robier A; Lescao Y; Beutter P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():120-4. PubMed ID: 8273465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An animal model for cochlear implants.
    Kretzmer EA; Meltzer NE; Haenggeli CA; Ryugo DK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):499-508. PubMed ID: 15148168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of intraoperative recordings of electrically evoked ABRs in a paediatric cochlear implant programme. Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Group.
    Mason SM; Sheppard S; Garnham CW; Lutman ME; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():136-41. PubMed ID: 8273468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory brainstem response results as predictors of behavioral auditory thresholds in severe and profound hearing impairment.
    Brookhouser PE; Gorga MP; Kelly WJ
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Aug; 100(8):803-10. PubMed ID: 2381254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are cochlear implants indicated in prelingually deaf adults?
    Manrique N; Huarte A; Molina M; Perez N; Espinosa JM; Cervera-Paz FJ; Miranda I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():192-4. PubMed ID: 7668632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Electrocochleographic detection of the summation potential in patients with inner ear deafness].
    Hesse G
    HNO; 1987 Nov; 35(11):451-4. PubMed ID: 3692930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Ash KR; Shallop JK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses.
    Kileny PR
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():37-42; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Behavioral effects of cochlear prosthesis on deafened monkeys.
    Balkany T; Reite M; Rasmussen K; Stypulkowski PH
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):435-46. PubMed ID: 3754955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrophysiology of the electrically and mechanically damaged cochlea.
    Hu K; Schwarz DW
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Aug; 18(5):199-204. PubMed ID: 2769831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transient deafness in young candidates for cochlear implants.
    Attias J; Raveh E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(5):325-33. PubMed ID: 17536201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic significance of electrocochleogram and auditory evoked brainstem response in totally or subtotally deaf patients.
    Ohashi T; Akagi M; Ochi K; Kenmochi M; Kinoshita H; Yoshino K
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():11-6. PubMed ID: 8740803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Auditory evoked potentials by electric stimulation of the cochlea].
    Sarfati D; Bestry C; Moatti L; Garabedian EN
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 7645888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perioperative electrical auditory brain stem response in candidates for pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Mason SM; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP; Garnham CW; Jowett CA
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 9233487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Limits of auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in the diagnosis of deafness in children].
    Ployet MJ; Robier A; Lemaire MC; Piau MC; Beutter P
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3706977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evoked potentials in the management of patients with cochlear implants: research and clinical applications.
    Kileny PR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):124S-127S. PubMed ID: 17496663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.