779 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20636724)
1. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Mardas N; Chadha V; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):688-98. PubMed ID: 20636724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement.
van Kesteren CJ; Schoolfield J; West J; Oates T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 20556256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog.
Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel H; Bolz W; Huerzeler MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1111-8. PubMed ID: 18983313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using two different xenograft protocols.
Cook DC; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2013 May; 84(5):585-94. PubMed ID: 22680300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic alveolar bone changes following ridge preservation with two different biomaterials.
Mardas N; D'Aiuto F; Mezzomo L; Arzoumanidi M; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 21561483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial.
Gholami GA; Najafi B; Mashhadiabbas F; Goetz W; Najafi S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1198-204. PubMed ID: 22092485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
Jung RE; Hälg GA; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19191793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry.
Matarasso S; Salvi GE; Iorio Siciliano V; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study.
Barone A; Aldini NN; Fini M; Giardino R; Calvo Guirado JL; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1370-7. PubMed ID: 18672985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases.
Hämmerle CH; Jung RE; Yaman D; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 17956571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles.
Hoang TN; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 21692633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dermal matrix and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for socket bone augmentation: a clinical and histologic study.
Fotek PD; Neiva RF; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 May; 80(5):776-85. PubMed ID: 19405831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ridge preservation of the molar extraction socket using collagen sponge and xenogeneic bone grafts.
Kim YK; Yun PY; Lee HJ; Ahn JY; Kim SG
Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 21753734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of bovine porous bone mineral in combination with collagen membrane or autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system for ridge preservation following tooth extraction.
Vasilic N; Henderson R; Jorgenson T; Sutherland E; Carson R
J Okla Dent Assoc; 2003; 93(4):33-8. PubMed ID: 12778623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation alveolar ridge preservation with a beta-tricalcium phosphate socket graft.
Horowitz RA; Mazor Z; Miller RJ; Krauser J; Prasad HS; Rohrer MD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(9):588-90, 592, 594 passim; quiz 604, 606. PubMed ID: 19998726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study.
Cardaropoli D; Cardaropoli G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 18990998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months.
Artzi Z; Tal H; Dayan D
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):1015-23. PubMed ID: 10914806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).
Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a putty-form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 on alveolar ridge preservation.
Neiva RF; Tsao YP; Eber R; Shotwell J; Billy E; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 18251643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
