170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20636726)
1. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of peri-implant buccal bone by computed tomography: an experimental study.
González-Martín O; Oteo C; Ortega R; Alandez J; Sanz M; Veltri M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 26178780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces.
Yen CY; Kuo PJ; Lin CY; Nie-Shiuh Chang N; Hsiao HY; Chin YT; Tsai CC; Lee SY
J Dent Sci; 2019 Jun; 14(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31210886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.
Lan Y; Huang X; Fan M; Yu H; Xie Z; Zhou Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6347-6359. PubMed ID: 35802190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Sun Z; Smith T; Kortam S; Kim DG; Tee BC; Fields H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e117-27. PubMed ID: 21300222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography in Measuring Thinning Oral and Buccal Bone.
Raskó Z; Nagy L; Radnai M; Piffkó J; Baráth Z
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 26645480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.
Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K
Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound.
Degen K; Habor D; Radermacher K; Heger S; Kern JS; Wolfart S; Marotti J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 27018152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurement from cone beam computed tomography compared with histologic analysis.
Tanaka Y; Dutra V; Lin WS; Levon J; Hamada Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 34756426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Pinheiro LR; Gaia BF; Oliveira de Sales MA; Umetsubo OS; Santos Junior O; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
