These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20637844)

  • 1. Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus).
    O'Rourke CF; Mendelson TC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 20637844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex-specific effects of gonadal steroids on conspecific odor preference in the rat.
    Xiao K; Kondo Y; Sakuma Y
    Horm Behav; 2004 Sep; 46(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 15325236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference for conspecifics evolves earlier in males than females in a sexually dimorphic radiation of fishes.
    Mendelson TC; Gumm JM; Martin MD; Ciccotto PJ
    Evolution; 2018 Feb; 72(2):337-347. PubMed ID: 29265367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incomplete behavioural isolation and asymmetric female preference in darter sister species (Percidae: Etheostoma).
    Martin MD; Mendelson TC
    J Fish Biol; 2013 Nov; 83(5):1371-80. PubMed ID: 24580670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female mating preference for own males on species and population level in Chromaphyosemion killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae).
    Kullmann H; Klemme B
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):377-86. PubMed ID: 17897816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual incentive motivation, olfactory preference, and activation of the vomeronasal projection pathway by sexually relevant cues in non-copulating and naive male rats.
    Portillo W; Paredes RG
    Horm Behav; 2004 Sep; 46(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 15325233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes.
    Gonzalez-Voyer A; Fitzpatrick JL; Kolm N
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2015-26. PubMed ID: 18489718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LE; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 15119440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Male preference for conspecific mates is stronger than females' in Betta splendens.
    Justus KT; Mendelson TC
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jun; 151():6-10. PubMed ID: 29501548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection.
    Higashi M; Takimoto G; Yamamura N
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761):523-6. PubMed ID: 10591210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid assessment of female preference for male size predicts subsequent choice of spawning partner in a socially monogamous cichlid fish.
    Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Cornuau JH; Keddar I; Ihle M; Motreuil S; Cézilly F
    C R Biol; 2011 Dec; 334(12):906-10. PubMed ID: 22123092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial and behavioural measures of social discrimination by captive male zebra finches: implications of sexual and species differences for recognition research.
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19010401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sand goby (Pomatoschistus minutus) males exposed to an endocrine disrupting chemical fail in nest and mate competition.
    Saaristo M; Craft JA; Lehtonen KK; Lindström K
    Horm Behav; 2009 Sep; 56(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 19576897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Fox JH; Wilczynski W; Rand AS
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6253):66-7. PubMed ID: 2296291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
    Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in the influence of mothers on the sociosexual preferences of their offspring.
    Kendrick KM; Haupt MA; Hinton MR; Broad KD; Skinner JD
    Horm Behav; 2001 Sep; 40(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11534995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.