BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20638396)

  • 1. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
    Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.
    Dhar M; Been PH; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3045-56. PubMed ID: 20600194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of future-oriented control: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Waxer M; Morton JB
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1648-54. PubMed ID: 21316473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age differences in attentional control: an event-related potential approach.
    Kray J; Eppinger B; Mecklinger A
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jul; 42(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 16008769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in task switching and response monitoring: evidence from ERPs.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mecklinger A; John O
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17250949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention and inhibition in children with ASD, ADHD and co-morbid ASD + ADHD: an event-related potential study.
    Tye C; Asherson P; Ashwood KL; Azadi B; Bolton P; McLoughlin G
    Psychol Med; 2014 Apr; 44(5):1101-16. PubMed ID: 23673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Vallesi A; Stuss DT; McIntosh AR; Picton TW
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19022270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Targets and non-targets in the aging brain: A go/nogo event-related potential study.
    Vallesi A
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 20974222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 115(9):2001-13. PubMed ID: 15294202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics.
    Novak KD; Foti D
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1470-82. PubMed ID: 26223291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional processes in children with ADHD: an event-related potential study using the attention network test.
    Kratz O; Studer P; Malcherek S; Erbe K; Moll GH; Heinrich H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Aug; 81(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 21641942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring.
    Clayson PE; Clawson A; Larson MJ
    Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 21470571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children.
    Flores AB; Digiacomo MR; Meneres S; Trigo E; Gómez CM
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19500893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.