These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20638823)

  • 1. Ability to detect change in patient function: responsiveness designs and methods of calculation.
    Lehman LA; Velozo CA
    J Hand Ther; 2010; 23(4):361-70; quiz 371. PubMed ID: 20638823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of questionnaires in outcome measurement in hand surgery].
    Zyluk A; Piotuch B
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2009; 74(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 19999612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients.
    Lin KC; Fu T; Wu CY; Wang YH; Liu JS; Hsieh CJ; Lin SF
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2010 Jun; 24(5):486-92. PubMed ID: 20053950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional outcomes post carpal tunnel release: a modified replication of a previous study.
    Appleby MA; Neville-Smith M; Parrott MW
    J Hand Ther; 2009; 22(3):240-8; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19457636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of inpatient burn rehabilitation: a prospective pilot study examining range of motion, hand function and balance.
    Schneider JC; Qu HD; Lowry J; Walker J; Vitale E; Zona M
    Burns; 2012 Mar; 38(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 22119446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which hand outcome measurement is best for Turkish speaking patients?
    Oksüz C; Akel BS; Leblebicioğlu G; Kayıhan H
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2012; 46(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 22491431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture.
    MacDermid JC; Richards RS; Donner A; Bellamy N; Roth JH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 25(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 10722826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Cleland JA; Whitman JM; Houser JL; Wainner RS; Childs JD
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):921-31. PubMed ID: 22749295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When minimal detectable change exceeds a diagnostic test-based threshold change value for an outcome measure: resolving the conflict.
    Stratford PW; Riddle DL
    Phys Ther; 2012 Oct; 92(10):1338-47. PubMed ID: 22767887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire--Dutch language version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    van der Giesen FJ; Nelissen RG; Arendzen JH; de Jong Z; Wolterbeek R; Vliet Vlieland TP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1121-6. PubMed ID: 18503809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument for assessing acute hand and wrist injuries in children.
    Kunkel S; Eismann E; Cornwall R
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011; 31(7):767-72. PubMed ID: 21926875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
    Gay RE; Amadio PC; Johnson JC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 12671856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical commentary in response to: clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation.
    Powell R; Wietlisbach C
    J Hand Ther; 2009; 22(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 19457637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responsiveness of the Bournemouth and Oswestry questionnaires: a prospective pilot study.
    Perillo M; Bulbulian R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Feb; 26(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 12584506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hand function measures for burn patients: a literature review.
    Lin SY; Chang JK; Chen PC; Mao HF
    Burns; 2013 Feb; 39(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 22985975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the effectiveness of a patient-oriented hand rehabilitation programme.
    Harth A; Germann G; Jester A
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 18694913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
    Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistically and clinically important change of pain scores in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorders.
    van Grootel RJ; van der Glas HW
    Eur J Pain; 2009 May; 13(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 18657456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.