BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20639039)

  • 1. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial.
    Penn HA; Gatti JM; Hoestje SM; DeMarco RT; Snyder CL; Murphy JP
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):690-5. PubMed ID: 20639039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Bonnard A; Fouquet V; Carricaburu E; Aigrain Y; El-Ghoneimi A
    J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1710-3; discussion 1713. PubMed ID: 15821565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery.
    Piaggio LA; Franc-Guimond J; Noh PH; Wehry M; Figueroa TE; Barthold J; González R
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1579-83. PubMed ID: 17707047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: intermediate results.
    Tong Q; Zheng L; Tang S; Zeng F; Du Z; Mei H; Wu Z; Pu J; Ruan Q
    Urology; 2009 Oct; 74(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 19628268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
    Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive open renal surgery.
    Chacko JK; Koyle MA; Mingin GC; Furness PD
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1575-7; discussion 1577-8. PubMed ID: 17707048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.
    Cascio S; Tien A; Chee W; Tan HL
    J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):335-8. PubMed ID: 17162086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children.
    Szavay PO; Luithle T; Seitz G; Warmann SW; Haber P; Fuchs J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Aug; 6(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 19926340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Wu JT; Gao ZL; Shi L; Han BM; Men CP; Zhang P; Xia SJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(22):2728-32. PubMed ID: 19951604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Zhang X; Li HZ; Ma X; Zheng T; Lang B; Zhang J; Fu B; Xu K; Guo XL
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 16890694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
    Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty in Children: Results of a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial.
    Gatti JM; Amstutz SP; Bowlin PR; Stephany HA; Murphy JP
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):792-797. PubMed ID: 27765696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.
    Troxel S; Das S; Helfer E; Nugyen M
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1073-6. PubMed ID: 16890693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
    Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months--is it technically possible?
    Kutikov A; Resnick M; Casale P
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1477-9; discussion 1479. PubMed ID: 16516026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
    Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.
    Vemulakonda VM; Cowan CA; Lendvay TS; Joyner BD; Grady RW
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. PubMed ID: 18708209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.